S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Attn: cdelena Ti Brake components

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 8, 2001 | 02:47 PM
  #11  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Here's an interesting article about some German company that's adapting the Porsche brakes to other cars. Scoll down a bit for the English.

http://www.movit.de/htm/info.htm

What they say about the ceramic rotors, however, doesn't jive with what I'd read in Christophorus. Maybe they're talking about a different sort of rotor than what's on the new 996TTs, since those are definitely designed for street use and operate perfectly well at those temps.

Here's a little writeup from Porsche about their PCCBs. http://www.porsche.com/english/911/models/...safety/pccb.htm It contradicts some of the stuff in the above website. *shrug*

I'd be interested in some PCCBs, but I already know I couldn't afford any sort of S2000 conversion.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2001 | 07:46 PM
  #12  
Utah S2K's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,307
Likes: 13
From: Ogden
Default

cmnsnse...maybe you need a new handle.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2001 | 09:27 PM
  #13  
krazik's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Default

I would be interested in any brake system that can show good positive improvement, but I am not interested in anything until I see actual data.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2001 | 03:44 AM
  #14  
cmnsnse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 5
From: Ocean City
Default

Well heck, Ill get the ball rolling on the prototype, quite honestly Ive been through about 4 designs and each time I think of something else that would make them easier for manufacturing or installation.

I have pretty much settled on the design, mostly the rotors would be the same overall dimentions but overcast to a larger diameter as to be cost effective if someone would want a 13" or better setup, but they can be turned down to 11.8 for a direct replacement of only the rotors(fnt)
As I was pulling the brake system off I thought hey why not make the calipers too, then I can fit a larger rotor in there and not have to worry about wheels/fit.
And while Im at it why not design into them efficiency in cooling, after all your just using them to change forward motion into heat.

I was mostly doing these as a personal project, but with enough interest can go ahead and get them done faster. But I dont want to get anyones hopes up, as there is always a possibility there will be problems with making them or the material may need to be modified, but that will all come out in testing, and I will surely let everyone know the results when that time comes.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2001 | 04:54 AM
  #15  
cmnsnse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 5
From: Ocean City
Default

Originally posted by Utah S2K
cmnsnse...maybe you need a new handle.
heh what would you have in mind? I've become quite infamous for my unorthodox thinking in one way or another

Mingster, I will definitly let you know whats going on with these things. BTW what is your price range for your x-brace? because no, I didnt see that thread . . .
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2001 | 02:30 PM
  #16  
cdelena's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

The S2000 stops within 1-2% of the distance of the best street cars in the world, and with a simple pad/duct mod has little or no fade on the track. With very inexpensive mods for fluid, pads, and lines you can wind up with braking that is unmatched in just about any street car at any price.

As I see it, the advantage to some of these changes discussed is not better braking but a reduction in unsprung weight and rotating mass. I know this is a good thing to do but I am unsure of how you measure the impact.. what do I get for every pound I reduce from the braking system on each wheel? what gain in acceleration and in handling?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2001 | 03:03 PM
  #17  
cmnsnse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 5
From: Ocean City
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by cdelena
[B]
As I see it, the advantage to some of these changes discussed is not better braking but a reduction in unsprung weight and rotating mass. I know this is a good thing to do but I am unsure of how you measure the impact.. what do I get for every pound I reduce from the braking system on each wheel?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2001 | 06:27 PM
  #18  
cmnsnse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 5
From: Ocean City
Default

Heh, I got more specifics on the Ti material, cant say what its made of (they wont tell me) but will let the rotors weigh MUCH less than 6lbs, I dont want to say untill I have one in my hand

Could almost save 20lbs PER WHEEL (rotor and caliper) in front, ummm no thats NOT a typo . . .

That would be umm errr like 60-70lbs off the weight of the car for a complete system, lemme go wake up now . . .
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2001 | 07:32 PM
  #19  
Schatten's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,936
Likes: 2
From: Austin
Default

<BFGrin>
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2001 | 07:46 PM
  #20  
dwb1's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Ashtabula
Default

Stock rotor = 14lbs-5.75 ozs - 6 lb rotors = 8lbs 5.75 ozs of weight savings
Stock calipers = 11lbs-2ozs - the other 11lbs-10.25ozs of weight savings and Ti calipers and pads weigh -8.25 ozs
don't know what they cost but would be neat.

just kidding
brad 6410

PS
always reading
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 PM.