CDV delete without ap1 flywheel cons?
I was asked to post this here. I'm going to be replacing the CMC on my AP2 and I thought about deleting the CDV at the same time. The thing is I was told that I should not delete the CDV unless I have an AP1 flywheel. Why is that? Thanks
2: AP2 flywheel is significantly heavier than AP1.
I swapped an ap1 slave into my car with the ap2 flywheel and instantly the clutch started to slip. Now, the clutch was most certainly gone, however it didn't slip at all with the ap2 slave. Not sure if it was coincidence, but I have a feeling the delay valve was dampening the clutch enough that it didn't slip. Just a thought from my experience.
Slave ap1 vs ap2 have different appearance. But functionally one can swap in for the other. Ap1 is cast iron I believe. Painted black. Ap2 is aluminum.
If anything, a mostly worn clutch would be more likely to slip with the cdv intact. Swapping to an ap1 it should grab more authoratively.
If anything, a mostly worn clutch would be more likely to slip with the cdv intact. Swapping to an ap1 it should grab more authoratively.
Trending Topics
If you remove the CDV you'll have the same slip characteristics you have now - flywheel / pressure plate slip, which has to do with the force the PP applies and the mass of the flywheel.
The CDV is to prevent driveline shock, but a lighter AP1 flywheel will allow the PP to bite better, which is where the slip is happening. CDV regulates the clamping speed, so if you remove the CDV, you just unmask more of the underlying issue, which is that the AP2 stock PP doesn't have enough bite for that 22lb flywheel.
The CDV is to prevent driveline shock, but a lighter AP1 flywheel will allow the PP to bite better, which is where the slip is happening. CDV regulates the clamping speed, so if you remove the CDV, you just unmask more of the underlying issue, which is that the AP2 stock PP doesn't have enough bite for that 22lb flywheel.













