S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Different kind of dyno?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 30, 2002 | 05:18 PM
  #1  
jlangton's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
From: Rochester
Default Different kind of dyno?

Does anyone have any experience with this type?? Thoughts?
Also....does anyone have any kind of ballpark figure for what a 2wd model of this cost?

http://dynapackusa.com/
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2002 | 07:28 PM
  #2  
ultimate lurker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 1
From: You wish
Default

Yes, I own one :-)

I have the basic model (1500) and it goes for $43,000 retail. Substantially more expensive than a dynojet (at least in initial purchase price), but more versatile as well as pretty portable too.

I've owned mine for 6 months and after having used dynojets for 7 years, the Dynapack is definitely superior for most testing and tuning jobs.

UL
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2002 | 09:52 PM
  #3  
Anthonymv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia
Default

you own one? wow, need to come up to NY to dyno!
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2002 | 10:12 PM
  #4  
ultimate lurker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 1
From: You wish
Default

I'm in SoCal :-)

UL
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2002 | 10:48 PM
  #5  
infinitebass's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

Hey UL, I know this has been gone over once or twice, but I don't recall in how much detail.

I remember you mentioning the versatility of the dynapack by being able to tune at individual RPM's, etc. Well, I was talking to a friend who opened a motorcycle tuning shop, and after him convincing me how much better the Mustang dyno he had was for tuning than a dynojet, I began to wonder, what are the differences in features between the Mustang and the Dynapack? The way he explained it, they seem to do similar things, including loading different amounts at each RPM, ramping the load up and down, etc.

Blake
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2002 | 07:27 AM
  #6  
ultimate lurker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 1
From: You wish
Default

The biggest difference is that the Mustang dyno is still a roller dyno, with all the inherent issues associated with trying to strap a car down. You can get accurate and useful results with virtually any dyno, but a roller dyno requires careful attention to tire pressure, alignment, strap down pressure, etc. which can be completely avoided on a Dynapack.

UL
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2002 | 11:43 AM
  #7  
infinitebass's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

Ah...Dynapack bolts directly to the hub, correct?

Blake
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 31, 2002 | 11:49 AM
  #8  
jlangton's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
From: Rochester
Default

Originally posted by infinitebass
Ah...Dynapack bolts directly to the hub, correct?

Blake

I believe so, yes
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2002 | 04:19 PM
  #9  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

UL,

Do you have a picture of the Dynapack in action? I would really like to see how it attaches to the hubs.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2003 | 08:15 AM
  #10  
ultimate lurker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 1
From: You wish
Default

There are some pictures at the Dynapack site.

UL
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kerm1t
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
3
Aug 16, 2013 08:01 AM
LonS2k
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
0
Oct 10, 2005 07:09 PM
Mighty
New York - Upstate New York S2000 Owners
9
Jun 21, 2005 02:58 PM
GodSpeed
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
5
Jun 26, 2002 02:14 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:53 PM.