S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Found another broken retainer tonight

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 07:23 AM
  #71  
TubeDriver's Avatar
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,337
Likes: 1
From: Gods Speed #57 Lemons #77
Default

Thanks for the pics, it does not get much more clear than that.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 07:59 AM
  #72  
clag's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO
Default

[QUOTE=RACER,Jul 16 2006, 08:49 PM]

I would say the very worst case scenario would be a slightly less efficient valve train due to the extra weight...if any.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 10:51 AM
  #73  
dhayner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA
Default

[QUOTE=tinkfist,Jul 14 2006, 06:29 AM]

What is #11?
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #74  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by Jsmply,Jul 17 2006, 02:22 AM
Thats true I didn't think about it that way. But is my understanding correct, is he saying that a 2.2L would not limp along showing no symptoms with a cracked retainer, but rather just blow up? That being so if you had an over-rev that caused damage you'd know instantly? Just curious as it would be good information to spread around as it might keep a few less "did I do any damage" threads from starting (at least from ap2 owners).
If I'm understanding Bill correctly he is saying that there is no need to inspect an F22C after an over rev becasue they'll show the effects of any damage immediately, and if that's the case we certainly don't need to be telling AP2 owners that they need to inspect their retainers after an over rev.

However, I gotta tell ya, if my car were an AP2 and I over reved the motor I'd want to pull the cam/rocker cover and take a look anyway. I might even want to put a bore scope in the spark plug holes and take a look around (which I don't do with my AP1, because I figure if the keepers are OK I haven't had any valve-piston contace.

I think that's the advice I'll go with until I have more information. As far as I know we have yet to see an AP2 with stretched/cracked retainers, but if it were my car I'd check them anyway, because it's an easy job and cheap insurance. Certainly taking a few minutes to take a look won't hurt anything.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 12:09 PM
  #75  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by dhayner,Jul 17 2006, 01:51 PM
When the retainer stretches enough, the keeper slips through the enlarged hole and no longer "keeps" the valve.
It is an assumption on my part, but I have always assumed that the stretched retainers allowed the keepers to seperate enough to lose their grip on the grove in the valve stem. This would allow the valve spring to shoot the retainer and keepers upward as the valve falls down into the cylinder.

Bill, do you know the failure mode here? Do the keepers pull through the retainer, or do they let go of the valve stem?
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 01:28 PM
  #76  
Jsmply's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Jul 17 2006, 03:05 PM
If I'm understanding Bill correctly he is saying that there is no need to inspect an F22C after an over rev becasue they'll show the effects of any damage immediately, and if that's the case we certainly don't need to be telling AP2 owners that they need to inspect their retainers after an over rev.

However, I gotta tell ya, if my car were an AP2 and I over reved the motor I'd want to pull the cam/rocker cover and take a look anyway. I might even want to put a bore scope in the spark plug holes and take a look around (which I don't do with my AP1, because I figure if the keepers are OK I haven't had any valve-piston contace.

I think that's the advice I'll go with until I have more information. As far as I know we have yet to see an AP2 with stretched/cracked retainers, but if it were my car I'd check them anyway, because it's an easy job and cheap insurance. Certainly taking a few minutes to take a look won't hurt anything.
Oh I agree you cannot be to careful, however I am very intrigued by what Bill said. Hopefully he chimes in with more input.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 05:10 PM
  #77  
Billman250's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 120 Days
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,386
Likes: 1,838
From: Long Island, New York
Default

You guys are putting words in my mouth, and not reading what I wrote.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 05:14 PM
  #78  
Billman250's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 120 Days
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,386
Likes: 1,838
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Jul 17 2006, 04:09 PM
It is an assumption on my part, but I have always assumed that the stretched retainers allowed the keepers to seperate enough to lose their grip on the grove in the valve stem. This would allow the valve spring to shoot the retainer and keepers upward as the valve falls down into the cylinder.

Bill, do you know the failure mode here? Do the keepers pull through the retainer, or do they let go of the valve stem?
The keepers are not moving at all on the valves. The retainers are splitting open, and walking up the keepers.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 05:20 PM
  #79  
Billman250's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 120 Days
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,386
Likes: 1,838
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Guys...the major difference here is the AP2 ends at 8k. An over-rev (9k)will not cause any damage.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2006 | 05:21 PM
  #80  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by Jsmply,Jul 17 2006, 04:28 PM
Oh I agree you cannot be to careful, however I am very intrigued by what Bill said. Hopefully he chimes in with more input.
Bill is "the man."
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:06 AM.