S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

help! oil catch can install... can i do this?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 05:17 PM
  #11  
fperra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by kitwetzler
Are you sure about that?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 05:21 PM
  #12  
fperra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by kitwetzler
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 05:30 PM
  #13  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Slows2k
The PCV Opens when vacuum is applied from the intake manifold, It is not opened by crankcase pressure.

In the bad old days before emmisions controls, crankcase vapor was released to the atmostsphere through a open breather in the valve cover. CARB/EPA
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 05:36 PM
  #14  
kitwetzler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by fperra
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 05:52 PM
  #15  
Slows2k's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45,374
Likes: 429
From: Mother F'in TN
Default

RED MX5, We are actually agreeing. Point being, before PCV systems, crankcase vapor was not positively evacuated. I've got a 340 small block Chrysler in the garage with a pair of breathers in both valve covers, no tubes, valves, or hoses used.

Kitwetzler, you are no the only person to report smoke on the track, caused by oil in the front breather. It seemes to be dependant on how many turns, and in what combination they are in to get this to occur. Since my car is not a track only car, I have not put a can/baffle in the front breather hose.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 05:55 PM
  #16  
Ludedude's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,835
Likes: 1
From: Vegas Baby, Vegas
Default

Originally posted by seung
thank you guys...

hmm... so which method do you guys recommend?
(actually this is the question that i wanted to ask the most.)
Seung, #2 is the proper way to do it. It will collect the oil in the can before sending the vapor back to the intake which is the whole purpose of running the catch can in the first place.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 06:19 PM
  #17  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Slows2k
RED MX5, We are actually agreeing. Point being, before PCV systems, crankcase vapor was not positively evacuated.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #18  
Slows2k's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 45,374
Likes: 429
From: Mother F'in TN
Default

Probably because it hasn't ran in 4 years! I need to track down some original 273 valve covers instead of the aftermarket covers that are now on it. PCV systems are far superior than not. Before the old Cuda' is back on the road, It will have a PCV. It will also not have a carburetor, but that's a different project.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 06:27 PM
  #19  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by kitwetzler
That said, I had a problem with the fresh air vent, not the PCV.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 06:30 PM
  #20  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Slows2k
Probably because it hasn't ran in 4 years! I need to track down some original 273 valve covers instead of the aftermarket covers that are now on it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:56 AM.