S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

I designed and built a solution to the heat bog

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 09:11 AM
  #31  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Kodokan_4,Oct 14 2005, 10:06 AM
The engine moves quite a bit while driving, and also moves due to the torque effect when accelerating/decelerating.

The OEM inlet for the airbox isn't connected to anything, therefore, there's no issue- but your inlet is connected to the stationary sidewall and the moving engine, without any flexible connection. I'm curious your inlet will stay in place or not, or if significant wear will occur at its attachment points.

I believe the OEM inlet is designed to pick up cool air that flows around the right side of the radiator when the car is moving. The OEM radiator cooling plate (air guide) and the hood of the car help to force cool air through this opening and to the OEM air inlet:

At slow speeds, or when starting from a stopped position, won't your air inlet pick up hot air rising from the front brake?

A bigger issue may be air flow. The OEM air inlet is designed to to utilize the venturi effect to increase the incoming air velocity, that's why it's shaped like a rectangle air horn/velocity stack. The OEM inlet is also very short and straight to reduce resistance. From the shape of your inlet, I don't see how it could flow nearly as much air as the OEM inlet. This might be a problem at high RPMs.
Pete, if you look at how the stock airbox is held down, you'll notice that it's not attached to the engine in any way. The airbox itself is relatively stationary. The flex of the engine is taken up by that "accordian" shaped rubber tube that goes to the TB. That stock inlet horn is actually attached to the radiator support. It too, is held in place and is solid with the airbox.

The OEM inlet sits on top of the radiator and draws air from in front of the rad. That hole you show in your picture lets air into the engine bay, where it's too late to be drawn into the engine. The whole problem as I've shown some years ago with my temp recordings is that the rad and the area just in front of the rad heats up the intake air tremendously once the rad gets up to operating temps. That slanted "airguide" in fact, is to prevent too much air from going up and over the radiator. It's there to channel air directly through the radiator. They actually had to cut slots in that airguide to allow air to get up past that guide to feed the horn.

"Velocity stacks" work best if there is no filter in the first place and if the stack leads directly to the intake manifold. In this case, the shape of that horn may purely be a matter of increasing the initial entry square area and not really acting as a "velocity stack". We see that elimination of this horn with the "snorkel" has no adverse affect on the air intake, even with that restriction I spoke of, but this is different because as the vehicle's speed increases, the snorkel does force air past that narrowing.

Whether or not this new invention will hamper high rpm airflow is yet to be determined, but as for a heat bog fix, I think this thing's going to do it. As for the brake's heat coming up, this won't happen. The brakes are behind that area in the front bumper and that area is separated by the wheel splashshield. Air that is heated by the brakes will not find it's way into the bumper area and this is where the air is taken from with this invention.

Let's take the AEM CAI for example. We all know that it's showing some proven gains. It also has 3 almost right angle bends. The stock airbox, with this invention also has 3 bends. I don't see the path the air takes will be that significantly different than some of the CAI and performance intakes out there.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #32  
AquilaEagle's Avatar
Administrator
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 95,183
Likes: 69
From: Heath & Reach, Beds, UK
Default

Originally Posted by DIESELPILOT1969,Oct 13 2005, 11:38 PM
Dang, cant get photo to post!
Use your s2ki photo album?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 09:32 AM
  #33  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by AquilaEagle,Oct 14 2005, 11:22 AM
Use your s2ki photo album?
He only bought his membership after he started this thread.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #34  
HOTRODS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
Default

Would a "cooling plate" give a more direct air flow and achieve the same results as this tube to the fender? Just curious.



Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 09:40 AM
  #35  
dozen5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

what about this guy?


https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=324675

hotrod, how's the fittment of that thing? and what does the underside of that thing look like?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 09:43 AM
  #36  
HOTRODS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
Default

Its as smooth on the bottom as on the top. The factory air guide was removed prior to installing the cooling plate.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 10:38 AM
  #37  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Would a "cooling plate" give a more direct air flow and achieve the same results as this tube to the fender? Just curious.
No. That "cooling" plate (IMO) is a "mis-nomer". It still doesn't stop hot air from going into the airbox during those "heat bog" situations where vehicle speed is slow. The air still goes over the radiator and it still takes air from that area in front of the radiator where it's been heated up by radiation and convection. You may have more air movement just in front of the airbox intake when the car is going at speed and this makes it a better alternative to the OEM air horn and airguide setup.

what about this guy?
That is probably a bit better than what Honda finally settled for but it still picks up that hot air that comes up through the slots in the airguide when the car is slow moving. I think that may be part of the reason that Honda never went with it. By having to go over the radiator, that same constriction is present that we see with the snorkel. For high rpm work, that restriction would be a detriment without the slight ram effect of the snorkel. It's far better to draw more air by having the horn cut short and not having the restriction.

This whole "heat bog" thing is a slow speed, bumper to bumper traffic scenario. It can be minimized or eliminated by adding or changing a component (snorkel, CAI, etc.) or by simply adjusting your driving style slightly to clear the hot air out of the intake system prior to trying to move off. I believe this is why Honda didn't fuss with it so much. High rpm intake flow is more important for an engine like this.
This invention would be great for those who can't quite get into the "altering of driving style".
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 11:23 AM
  #38  
HOTRODS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
Default

Originally Posted by xviper,Oct 14 2005, 01:38 PM
No. That "cooling" plate (IMO) is a "mis-nomer". It still doesn't stop hot air from going into the airbox during those "heat bog" situations where vehicle speed is slow. The air still goes over the radiator and it still takes air from that area in front of the radiator where it's been heated up by radiation and convection. You may have more air movement just in front of the airbox intake when the car is going at speed and this makes it a better alternative to the OEM air horn and airguide setup.

That is probably a bit better than what Honda finally settled for but it still picks up that hot air that comes up through the slots in the airguide when the car is slow moving. I think that may be part of the reason that Honda never went with it. By having to go over the radiator, that same constriction is present that we see with the snorkel. For high rpm work, that restriction would be a detriment without the slight ram effect of the snorkel. It's far better to draw more air by having the horn cut short and not having the restriction.

This whole "heat bog" thing is a slow speed, bumper to bumper traffic scenario. It can be minimized or eliminated by adding or changing a component (snorkel, CAI, etc.) or by simply adjusting your driving style slightly to clear the hot air out of the intake system prior to trying to move off. I believe this is why Honda didn't fuss with it so much. High rpm intake flow is more important for an engine like this.
This invention would be great for those who can't quite get into the "altering of driving style".
I agree. Thats why I put "cooling plate". All I was hoping for was more air supply at speed with the plate. I've never really been concerned with heat bog in slow moving traffic. Thanks for the input/insight Xviper.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #39  
TR-S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by DIESELPILOT1969,Oct 13 2005, 04:21 PM
I do this for a living, only difference is I do it for aircraft R&D. I still have a few minor adjustments to make but I will have it ironed out by next week at the latest. How it is made: It is molded plastic and it is not even fastened to the fender, it fits snugly into the airbox and that is all. The only thing I had to do to "make it fit persay" is the thin aluminum tubing below it has to be pushed down a bit for clearance. I will have few for sale if anyone is interested.
Many are interested with your project, if it isn't too expensive and it does actually reduce heat bog, then you have a hot selling mod for the S.
I am subcribed, sinve most my driving is city streets during rush hours.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 12:36 PM
  #40  
Kodokan_4's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,594
Likes: 71
From: Judo Town, USA
Default

Thanks, xviper!

-Pete
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:13 PM.