S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Interesting Video on Direct vs. Port Injection

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-04-2018, 09:18 AM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default Interesting Video on Direct vs. Port Injection

Old 11-05-2018, 03:01 AM
  #2  

 
Slowcrash_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,231
Received 405 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

I wonder how Honda avoids having the intake valves gummed up with crap like other DI equipped cars from Germany. Toyota and GM use both PFI and DI in their engines, which helps both from efficiency and as a way to keep intake valves free from deposits. As far as I can tell the L15 and K20C both run strictly off DI.
Old 11-05-2018, 09:06 AM
  #3  

 
Chuck S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chesterfield VA
Posts: 12,534
Received 1,134 Likes on 997 Posts
Default

Here's an alternate view from everyone's favorite profane Aussie car expert:


-- Chuck
Old 11-05-2018, 03:35 PM
  #4  

 
zeroptzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 25,396
Received 3,378 Likes on 2,454 Posts
Default

Looks like my Civic turbo motor may be recalled due to fuel dilution issues, just like every other DI turbo out there since the Mazdaspeed3 came on the market years ago. Seems like the combination of a DI turbo and modern trannies that keep rpms low (for fuel economy gains) are prone to low speed pre-ignition. Running rich to prevent LSPI and short distance driving typical of most city driving exacerbates the fuel dilution issue. Seems like Honda had to follow the crowd just to keep up with fuel economy pressures.
Old 11-05-2018, 05:18 PM
  #5  

 
darcyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: um, a house
Posts: 4,221
Received 340 Likes on 277 Posts
Default

yeah, the DI engines just aren't perfected yet- sure, better mileages are being realized, but at what cost for the owner who is out of warranty. Toyota provides a port injector in addition to the DI's to keep the valves cleaner as mentioned above. I've been keeping my b16A EM1 as I just can't trust where a DI engine will be 10, 15, 20 years from now.

What are the manufacturers saying- is anyone providing a service interval for them, or are they just sticking their heads in the sand hoping the cars make it out of warranty without major pay outs? I'd be furious if my new DI engine was about to be a very expensive paper weight.

darcy
Old 11-05-2018, 05:43 PM
  #6  

 
zeroptzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 25,396
Received 3,378 Likes on 2,454 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by darcyw
yeah, the DI engines just aren't perfected yet- sure, better mileages are being realized, but at what cost for the owner who is out of warranty. Toyota provides a port injector in addition to the DI's to keep the valves cleaner as mentioned above. I've been keeping my b16A EM1 as I just can't trust where a DI engine will be 10, 15, 20 years from now.

What are the manufacturers saying- is anyone providing a service interval for them, or are they just sticking their heads in the sand hoping the cars make it out of warranty without major pay outs? I'd be furious if my new DI engine was about to be a very expensive paper weight.

darcy
Word is that Honda will be reprogramming their pcm's as part of the impending recall, and offering a 6 year unlimited mileage warranty extension. I'll take the warranty extension, and with it being unlimited mileage it kind of shows that Honda is confident the current issues are not affecting engine wear. While I've seen some used oil samples with higher than average fuel dilution on the 1.5 turbos, it wasn't accompanied by excessive wear of engine parts. Still not the best situation.
Old 11-05-2018, 05:44 PM
  #7  

Thread Starter
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck S
Here's an alternate view from everyone's favorite profane Aussie car expert:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBAqxSXFyb4&t=7s

-- Chuck
This was posted in one of the responses:

2 Utes , 1 fitted with a catch can and the other not , one filled up with soot in the intake and the other didn't, same Utes bought the same time, used in the same manner , not scientific but close enough for me to run a catch can now , Ill add. they were not my Utes and mine is a newer model so maybe completely irrelevant who knows
C&D had a Raptor get a lot slower after 40k miles. Makes me wonder...
Old 11-06-2018, 12:41 PM
  #8  

 
Chuck S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chesterfield VA
Posts: 12,534
Received 1,134 Likes on 997 Posts
Default

I just installed a JLT catch can on my Ford 3.5 EcoBoost in my 2017 Expedition which has direct-only injection. Hardest parts of the job are getting to the engine with out a scaffold and reattaching the engine modesty cover. If you have this engine in one of your other cars note the JLT kit has all quick connect hoses. 10 minute job. Can't see any harm. Will check it in a couple thousand miles.

-- Chuck
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gerry100
Car and Bike Talk
41
10-19-2018 04:43 PM
Kdlopez01
Car and Bike Talk
10
10-27-2008 10:55 AM
s2kobsession
S2000 Forced Induction
12
01-02-2008 02:26 PM
Tyraid2K
S2000 Talk
6
09-30-2006 09:07 PM
REV_29K
Australia & New Zealand S2000 Owners
25
05-19-2005 06:56 PM



Quick Reply: Interesting Video on Direct vs. Port Injection



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:38 PM.