S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Knock Sensor: Different cars work, Money Saver!

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-28-2010, 08:27 AM
  #41  

 
spectacle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,894
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The price difference isn't worth the risk. If you can afford to drive this car, you can afford to stop being cheap and just get what you know works.
Old 09-28-2010, 09:12 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
bpaspi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Billman250,Sep 28 2010, 02:13 PM
Knock sensors detect detonation, or pre-ignition. With each "knock", or ping as it is usually described, micro bits of metal will be etched away, from most likely the spark plug tip and/or the piston.

In extreme cases, I have seen spark knock eat a hole in a piston. It looked as if someone used a sandblaster to blow a hole in it. This was a carburated, old american junker. NOT an s2k.
The weakest part in our engine in case of detonation are the piston top rings. They can break in several pieces but stay inside the ring areas.
Old 09-28-2010, 03:23 PM
  #43  

Thread Starter
 
OneSilverS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 878
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

We'll see how everything pans out.
Old 09-29-2010, 11:17 AM
  #44  
Registered User
 
Seattle2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by OneSilverS2k,Sep 28 2010, 04:23 PM
We'll see how everything pans out.
Run a low-octane fuel while you're testing. This will result in more knock, and if your sensor is working properly, you should just have some power loss when it's all said and done.
Old 10-04-2010, 11:39 AM
  #45  
Community Organizer

 
freq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: in my garage
Posts: 20,983
Received 185 Likes on 163 Posts
Default

http://www.standardbrand.com/upload/Standa...OCK-SENSORS.PDF

Saw this .pdf and thought it was appropriate to post here.
Old 10-18-2010, 01:24 PM
  #46  
Registered User

 
kaissi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Coto De Caza
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Many of us think that the difference in knock sensor price is not worth the risk. True. However, the argument itself is meaningful.

I agree that the car might operate with no CEL. But, I think the ECU works as follows: it retards the timing until no knock is read from the sensor. Therefore, if the sensor is more sensitive than the actual OEM proposed one, the car might retard timing more than it should and hence, you'll be running fine, no reliability sacrifice, but more fuel consumption and less power, that you most likely not notice. AND CEL will not tell you

Though, the question is this: "if a CIVIC or ACCORD 4 Cyl block that is close to an S2000 block are using different sensors, why is a 2.0L S2000 using the same knock sensor as the 2.2L sensor"? I read it earlier in this thread, a fellow suggested. A mechanic as I remember.

How much different a knock sound is from a CIVIC to an S2000!!?!?!


Old 10-18-2010, 02:05 PM
  #47  

Thread Starter
 
OneSilverS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 878
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Fuel consumption has been the same. Also I would like to add that the motor it came from is a '03 civic si with a 2.0 litre.. it is a stock OEM sensor, and is brand new. The car has been running great, and ( don't get mad at me, but for daily use I use 87 octane. ) so I have tested it with low octane no difference, and I don't even notice the high octane difference on a stock S2000. I will be getting a AEM stand alone soon and we'll see when i test a S2000 knock sensor compared to a civic si knock sensor. Thank you.
Old 10-18-2010, 11:40 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
Seattle2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by OneSilverS2k,Oct 18 2010, 03:05 PM
Fuel consumption has been the same. Also I would like to add that the motor it came from is a '03 civic si with a 2.0 litre.. it is a stock OEM sensor, and is brand new. The car has been running great, and ( don't get mad at me, but for daily use I use 87 octane. ) so I have tested it with low octane no difference, and I don't even notice the high octane difference on a stock S2000. I will be getting a AEM stand alone soon and we'll see when i test a S2000 knock sensor compared to a civic si knock sensor. Thank you.
Wow, even more bad ideas. Don't worry, I'm not mad...it's not my car, and thank you for putting yours on the line, to test ridiculous operating conditions.
Old 10-19-2010, 01:13 AM
  #49  
Registered User

 
kaissi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Coto De Caza
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What are the changes that make a knock sound changes?
Piston shape?!?!

I'm still wondering why the same knock sensor is used for F20 and F22 while it should be difference than a civic or accord 4 cyl 2.0 or 2.4 similar block?
Old 10-19-2010, 03:20 AM
  #50  

Thread Starter
 
OneSilverS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 878
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kaissi,Oct 19 2010, 01:13 AM
What are the changes that make a knock sound changes?
Piston shape?!?!

I'm still wondering why the same knock sensor is used for F20 and F22 while it should be difference than a civic or accord 4 cyl 2.0 or 2.4 similar block?
The only thing I can guess is the F22 doesn't have larger pistons or different shape, just a different stroke.


Quick Reply: Knock Sensor: Different cars work, Money Saver!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:28 AM.