S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Low Dyno Result?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 8, 2001 | 12:28 AM
  #1  
KIDS2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
From: Auckland
Default

Hi all, i just dyno my s2000 for the first time on saturday. Max Power recorded was 125.3kW@8417RPM. a 30% decrease from honda's claimed crank 177kW. Is this normal? I was kinda expecting 140kW at the wheels.
Other Conditions:
Was a very Hot Day
Had a Fan to simulate cool air entering engine
RON98 Fuel (98 octane rating)
10,007km mileage.
Any comments would be greatful. cheers!
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2001 | 06:35 AM
  #2  
Utah S2K's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,307
Likes: 13
From: Ogden
Default

http://www.s2000online.com/forums/showthre...?threadid=10774
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2001 | 07:57 AM
  #3  
ultimate lurker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 1
From: You wish
Default

Kid,

What kind of dynomometer did you use? Different chassis dynos read differently. They are best used to compare differences before and after, not to assess absolute power accurately.

UL
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2001 | 12:30 PM
  #4  
cdelena's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

That is an unusually low reading.. normally you would expect 140-150 KW. You have to calculate 15-20% in drive train losses so your expectation was in line. There is enough difference in dynos and operation that a 5% variation is not unusual, but the 30% that you are seeing makes that test suspect.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2001 | 01:17 PM
  #5  
KIDS2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
From: Auckland
Default

Well on the sheet on paper its said:
"Torque and Power corrected in accordance with ISO1585"

but here is the weird part:
Peak Torque: 394.5NM@6633RPM

Very weird
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2001 | 05:34 PM
  #6  
ultimate lurker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 1
From: You wish
Default

Definitely something wrong here, as that equates to nearly 300 lbs-ft of torque. That's twice the crank torque of the S2K engine, yet it is noticeably less than the actual wheel torque in any gear (Corrected wheel torque is usually around 130 lbs-ft or 175 Nm). Even 6th gear should show about 600 Nm or so at that rpm at the wheels (actual).

If your engien really was producing 300 lbs-ft at 6600 rpm, your corrected hp should have been int eh vicinity of 375 hp, or 280 kW.

Strange.

UL
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
6262
Southern Ontario S2000 Owners
3
Aug 29, 2013 12:49 PM
S2000 Cabrio
S2000 Forced Induction
1
Aug 3, 2005 10:42 AM
Chiung
S2000 Under The Hood
10
Jul 13, 2004 03:49 AM
mikecl713
S2000 Talk
10
Jul 29, 2003 07:10 PM
cjb80
S2000 Under The Hood
30
Jan 3, 2003 06:52 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:05 PM.