You sure? The only EMS graph that I've seen on an NA application didn't really gain much. It added some torque in the mid-range because the tuner was able to lower VTEC and re-map the fuel & timing maps appropriately, and it added some power above 8300 because it leaned out the mixture, but it didn't really add much peak power. A VAFC can lean out the mixture above 8300 and get the same amount of power there... the only thing it can't do is re-map the ignition map, which would allow it to lower VTEC to, say, 4500 RPM.

 

Hmm... OK, then. You're the boss.

 

The EMS is definately KEY...... Hams was the dude that hit 240 RWHP and he did that with teh EMS... There is another car out there that has 250 RWHP and maybe more right that is tuned via the EMS stock exhaust and headers but lots of engine work... right UL


Beroz

 

ohhhh more details please.

 

not sure I have anymore details about the car..... I had a brief conversation with UL when he was over here tuning my car..... Not sure he was willing to go into anymore detail about it.... If your seriously interested i t wouldn't hurt if you asked him....
Beroz

 

But we all know that UL can get an additional 20 HP by just using a salad fork taped to the MAP sensor wiring harness.

 

[QUOTE=xviper,Sep 22 2004, 08:24 AM]But we all know that UL can get an additional 20 HP by just using a salad fork taped to the MAP sensor wiring harness.

 

That's awesome! I'd love to see what he could do with a set of steak knives. Or maybe even some of those tiny forks that they give you when you eat crab or lobster.

 

mmmmmmmmm.....crab or lobster

 

any disadvantages to the EMS?