S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

More Power to the Ground?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 14, 2002 | 01:30 PM
  #1  
vananron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default More Power to the Ground?

I know that the BHP is 240 on the S2000 but the RWHP only registers in the high 190's or very low 200's. I want to know if anybody has had any success in aftermarket parts that put more of the engine's power to the ground a.e. carbon fiber drive shaft, different transfer case etc.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2002 | 02:08 PM
  #2  
Schatten's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,936
Likes: 2
From: Austin
Default

you'll always lose a certain % of the flywheel horsepower when its transferred to the wheels.

a cf driveshaft or something similar would only help the motor reach the power much quicker by lightening up the drivetrain.

btw, we don't have transfer cases =D this isn't a 4WD vehicle.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2002 | 02:47 PM
  #3  
ejis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Bethesda
Default

Lighter weight - well...lower inertia really - rotating parts (drive shaft, flywheel, wheels...) will make a difference in power to the ground as measured on a dyno, and as felt in acceleration, since that's all based on how quickly you can change the speed of the wheels. However, I don't really know of many parts to do this except wheels. BTW, a driveshaft has such a relatively small diameter, that lowering it's inertia noticeably would require a drastic change in construction and material, read expensive...

There are many easier ways to get some power, and this won't get you much. A 20% loss from flywheel to the ground isn't bad. Also, we can't really verify what the engine is making at the flywheel, we just take Honda's word for it and assume "240 hp" even though everyone's engine is different and any one may make less - or more.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2002 | 02:50 PM
  #4  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Have you considered 4.44 or 4.77 rear gears?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2002 | 03:40 PM
  #5  
vananron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default

I thought about changing the gears, but I am concerned about the fact that I would be shifting too many times, so you know at what mile per hour you need to shift in first gear with 4.44 or 4.77 gears?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2002 | 03:49 PM
  #6  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Originally posted by vananron
I thought about changing the gears, but I am concerned about the fact that I would be shifting too many times, so you know at what mile per hour you need to shift in first gear with 4.44 or 4.77 gears?
I shift by "tach" not by road speed so I couldn't tell you. There are speed calculators available if you want to know the speeds in each gear. Here's a thread I started that talks about all kinds of stuff after a 4.44 gear swap:
https://www.s2ki.com/forums/showthread.php?...&threadid=85331
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spdracerut
S2000 Racing and Competition
4
Nov 14, 2019 06:20 AM
offroadr35
S2000 Under The Hood
24
Aug 7, 2017 03:11 PM
turbo997
S2000 Talk
43
Jun 30, 2006 05:51 AM
campbuds
S2000 Talk
20
Jun 6, 2006 07:02 PM
malachi
S2000 Talk
10
Mar 30, 2001 08:43 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:33 PM.