S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

oil bolt install w/ pics

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-03-2016, 02:52 PM
  #111  

 
Ajval79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 190
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Looks like a hairline crack formed by the oil jet. I was able to remove the bolt. I loaded it up with locktite. Took my car and had Evans tuning tune the car a day later. All is working fine. I ordered an oil pressure sending unit to wire into my AEM EMS and have an oil pressure fail safe set up to prevent further damage if it falls out.

Name:  63F3B4C2-D2F1-4363-91A0-BBD33468CBCD_zpstaajs4j2.jpg
Views: 818
Size:  143.5 KB
Old 10-22-2016, 02:31 AM
  #112  

 
turbo8765's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 672
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Should loctite be routinely used with these?
Old 10-22-2016, 04:43 AM
  #113  
Registered User

 
Jaspah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 301
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No.

Service manual says: no loctite and exactly 16nm. (12ft/lbs)
Overtighting these bolts will damage the jets, and too loose... well, you don't want them to come loose either.
Old 03-17-2017, 07:51 PM
  #114  
Registered User

 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 77
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I tackled this project today. The front bolt is a pain to get in. For those looking for the right tools for the job, this is what I put together after fiddling for 1/2 hr. I was able to thread it in, in 30 seconds with this setup. Also, as stated in the thread a telescoping magnetic pickup tool will help you orientate and hold the squirter in place as you tighten the bolt

1/4" driver, extension(s), universal joint with tape to support, and a 10mm socket


Old bolt on bottom, updated version on top
Old 05-13-2017, 04:57 AM
  #115  

 
rpg51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,295
Received 256 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

I just read through this thread. I'm considering whether to do this upgrade. I would like to find the engine number for my 02 ap1 before I make a final decision. I took a look see at the front of my engine this AM and I see a number stamped in the block on the driver's side under the intake manifold toward the front. The number is obscured by the manifold and impossible to read except for a couple of numbers. Is there a trick to getting a good view of this number? Or is the number recorded somewhere else on the car? This is a US car.

EDIT - I FOUND A WAY TO READ THE NUMBER - NOT EASY.

GOOD NEWS - MY 02 AP1 HAS ENGINE NUMBER 1029198 - LOOKS LIKE I'M IN THE CLEAR. THANK GOODNESS.

Last edited by rpg51; 05-13-2017 at 05:59 AM.
Old 09-20-2019, 01:49 PM
  #116  

 
Savedsol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On the Kessel run
Posts: 424
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Is there any harm in only doing #4 if that's the problem one?
Old 09-20-2019, 07:32 PM
  #117  
Moderator

 
Billman250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 22,016
Received 1,271 Likes on 775 Posts
Default

All cylinders 1-4 can be scored during sustained high speed operation (do not mistake this for track use) or by FI application, if the jet bolts are not replaced on all four cylinders.
The following users liked this post:
twohoos (09-23-2019)
Old 10-28-2019, 10:25 AM
  #118  
Registered User
 
Eap01s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dezoris
I have to ask, and I have read, and read and debated about the install, can anyone to this day provide concrete proof these oil jet bolts provide better cyl. lubrication than the pre #1025386 engines, in normal conditions.

What is normal?
Daily US driving anywhere.
Occasional autox 7 events a year.

What is abnormal?
Road Race, track driving, extended high Speed driving 100MPH plus for more than 3 minute intervals.

F/I any type.

Does it make a difference and is there any proof?

And I know that guys like Harry Cash and twohoos
would not do it unless they thought there was a mechanical advantage to it. But where are the engine failures resulting in using older jets.

Is the supposed engine failure more viscosity related or is it starvation. Honda stated that the bolt upgrade was not a starvation issue.

Any info?
The proof is Honda changed it for a reason that's all ya need to know lol
Old 10-28-2019, 01:36 PM
  #119  
Registered User

 
Mr.Matchbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Munich - Germany
Posts: 1,141
Received 278 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

What is abnormal?
.........extended high Speed driving 100MPH plus for more than 3 minute intervals.


So, my commutation to and from work is abnormal?

Last edited by Mr.Matchbox; 10-28-2019 at 01:40 PM.
Old 10-28-2019, 03:43 PM
  #120  
Registered User

 
Mr.Matchbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Munich - Germany
Posts: 1,141
Received 278 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Getting a little bit more serious...
In the german Honda S2000 community, one member reported about problems with the new, upgraded bolts. He replaced them on 2 engines, to cure problems with low oil pressure on idle.
He wrote that the bolts should open only above 2 bar / 29 PSI.

He found the pressure regulatuion spring inside the bolts broken on 6 out of 8 bolts, leaving them open all the time, causing the oil pressure problems. Pictures say more than words:

https://s2k.de/forum/index.php/Threa...BCsen-Problem/

If you have low oil pressure at idle, have a look.

Last edited by Mr.Matchbox; 10-28-2019 at 11:01 PM.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:06 AM.