S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Proper Engine Break-in Technique Article

Old Apr 26, 2003 | 07:47 PM
  #1  
Sev's Avatar
Sev
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Default Proper Engine Break-in Technique Article

Interesting.

http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm

Comments?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 08:21 PM
  #2  
Asura's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, Orange County
Default

I think that has been posted before. Personally, I would do anything to a race engine since it will be rebuilt more frequently. Aggressive break-in is synonymous for abuse. Definately not for an S2000.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 10:10 PM
  #3  
infinitebass's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

Asura, he's not talking about race only engines. Did you read the article?

Can you dispute what he says with any kind of knowledge of engines? I'd love to hear what UL has to say about this. I don't think he chimed in the last time.

Blake
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2003 | 10:33 PM
  #4  
infinitebass's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

*edit* wrong thread!

Blake
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 01:38 AM
  #5  
ellisnc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
From: Dublin, OH
Default

I've heard stories of the factory where the NSX, S2k and Insight are built...

I've heard that each new NSX is taken out on a test track and test driven fairly hard to make sure everything is correct with it. I'm not sure about the S2000, but it's built at the same factory. This is why most cars have between 5 and 10 miles on them when you first get them because they are run through some kind of test course before being put in the lot or on the truck. I've seen first hand how the people doing the testing drive these cars, hard...

According to this website that's pretty good news.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 02:51 AM
  #6  
honda606's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,937
Likes: 7
From: houston
Default

Welcome to three years ago. This has been going around the ls1.com forum and corvetteforum.com forever.

Personally I'll stick with what the Honda engineers say. Why beat the piss out of a brand new car for 5 extra horsepower.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 07:38 AM
  #7  
Sev's Avatar
Sev
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Default

I haven't seen this article posted here. Must have missed it.

Those of us who have been around the s2000 for over 2 years remember that there were lots of differing opionions on this subject.

I wonder what UL thinks of this article as he is probably one of the very few that are capable of answering to this type of article.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 27, 2003 | 08:22 AM
  #8  
cdelena's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

Originally posted by infinitebass
The LT1 weighs about 452 lbs. How much does the F20C weigh?

Blake
328 lbs. why?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 09:07 AM
  #9  
Sideways's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,033
Likes: 21
From: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Default

I wonder if the different material in our cylinder walls makes a difference in this?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2003 | 01:34 PM
  #10  
honda606's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,937
Likes: 7
From: houston
Default

I wonder if the different material in our cylinder walls makes a difference in this?
If you went to the link, and actually read the entire webpage, your question would be answered.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 AM.