S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

To relocate battery or not to relocate battery?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 3, 2001 | 06:55 PM
  #1  
P.O.S.2000
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default To relocate battery or not to relocate battery?

What is everyone's opinion on this subject?

Worth it or not worth it?


I relocated the battery on my old Toyota and it was great until I tried to check my ignition timing only to find out that I had to get another battery to bring up to the front to check things!

Who knows....

Just looking for a little more "edge"
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2001 | 06:56 PM
  #2  
shingles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Land
Default

I would say no... because I suspect that honda took the battery weight into consideration when balancing this particular car.

And I know what you mean about the timing gun... I have to use another car's battery when I want to do it for my CRX.

-Shing
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2001 | 09:02 PM
  #3  
nibble's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,206
Likes: 15
From: Bergen County, NJ
Default

I agree with shingles 100%.

cheers,
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2001 | 09:33 PM
  #4  
MajorHavoc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Default

How about one of those "light weight" batteries?
I saw an ad recently for a 13 lb. battery. I think it was called a Dynabat battery?
The ad stated that typical batteries weigh 40 lbs! Is that close to reality?
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2001 | 09:37 PM
  #5  
shingles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
From: Sugar Land
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by MajorHavoc
[B]How about one of those "light weight" batteries?
I saw an ad recently for a 13 lb. battery.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2001 | 10:29 PM
  #6  
malachi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
From: SF
Default

relocating would screw with the balance.
if you want to save weight i'd suggest replacing it with the Spoon battery and pulling out the spare.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2001 | 12:51 AM
  #7  
P.O.S.2000
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks everyone...

I had pretty much figured that I would not...I would have added more weight to the car in battery cable alone. That and I was lazy today.

Curious...
Has anybody corner weighted their Stook's to see what the balance is?
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2001 | 04:20 AM
  #8  
s2ktaxi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Going with a light weight dry cell battery if you don't need the cold cranking amps (CCA) is the way to go - just make sure you take out similar weight at the rear of the car (say, the spare? or replace the muffler with a 20lb lighter one?)

Check out: http://216.97.114.64/v666-5/catalog/other_.../odyssey545.cfm

Disclaimer: no relation to the site or vendor.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2001 | 05:41 AM
  #9  
Pepe's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: San Juan
Default

Originally posted by P.O.S.2000


Curious...
Has anybody corner weighted their Stook's to see what the balance is?
Yes.

I don't have the number with me but here's what I remember.

The car is extremely well balance with the driver in the car. Ever wonder why the spare tire (at 25 lbs) is on the right side?

Still, the car is heavier on the front than the back.

We have found on the race car (2,700 pounds/half tank of gas) that adding weight to the back (100-lbs) made the car more friendly to turn on a fast course.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2001 | 08:56 AM
  #10  
malachi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
From: SF
Default

interesting.
that would imply that switching to a Spoon battery and lighter header could yield positive handling results - and would also indicate that removing the spare is NOT a good idea after all.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:11 PM.