S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Safety of X-braces

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 04:16 PM
  #1  
tram57's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Durham
Default Safety of X-braces

Most cars are designed so the engine/transmission drops under the care during a head on collision rather than impinge on the passenger compartment. The DiGrappa, Comptec, and Whiteline X-braces appear to have potential to interfere with this during a crash. The Cusco 3 point brace seems somewhat less inclined to do so. Any thoughts from the informed?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 04:59 PM
  #2  
chuhsi's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 4
From: San Francisco
Default

i'd be really interested to hear an answer to this.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 05:23 PM
  #3  
turbo_pwr's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,831
Likes: 2
From: Paradise Valley, AZ miss NYC
Default

Simple enough, if it bothers you, don't put it on. Most cars also don't have a huge beam going across it in front of the engine.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 05:41 PM
  #4  
Harpoon's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 7
From: Oregon
Default

This has been posted before. I think the general consensus was that the weight of the engine in a high speed crash would break right thru any sort of brace under it.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 06:20 PM
  #5  
Ek9's Avatar
Ek9
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 1
Default

I'm with turbo_pwr. Adding an Xbrace changes the engineering as honda intended it. That's the only thing you know. Without a real crash test anything else is pointless speculation.

If you worry about it, don't install it. I'm planning on getting one but, I also believe the probability of a full speed, head on colision's low enough that it's a non-issue. I might be wrong and it might kill me but, that's just how probability is. Sometimes your number comes up.

A head on collision's far safer than getting T boned. I'd worry more about that.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 08:01 PM
  #6  
Stratocaster's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,399
Likes: 19
Default

I think is has been more then 1.5 years since this topic last came up. From a 5yr member non the less this time. I even had to reread the first post, "DiGrappa", man that was a long time ago, years.

Again, I agree with Dan on this one.The braces are designed for for strength in the corners and not under the motor. Think of it like a board, easy to break if hit in the middle, hard is hit in the edges.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 11:28 PM
  #7  
Luke530's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: from the CHii
Default

if you get into an accident where your engine and transmission were to break off and drop under the car... an x-brace will be the last last kind of brace you will be worrying about.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 11, 2006 | 03:31 AM
  #8  
Jasonoff's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 16,673
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo
Default

^ true.

The amount of force it would take to eject your engine and trans through he bottom of your car would most likely tear that xbrace off like paper.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 06:14 AM
  #9  
Ek9's Avatar
Ek9
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 1
Default

Wishful thinking. That's all I'm seeing here. Not backed up by any kind of proof.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 07:07 AM
  #10  
Stratocaster's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,399
Likes: 19
Default

I also don't think we have even (in the last 6 years) seen a wrecked car that the motor was pushed out the bottom either. Again, more wishful thinking.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:55 AM.