S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Spark Plug Torque Misconceptions - Honda Says...

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 16, 2016 | 12:00 PM
  #1  
RolanTHUNDER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 234
From: In BOOST
Default Spark Plug Torque Misconceptions - Honda Says...

I am about to fit the new BKR8EIX plugs in my SC'd AP1 so I read up on several threads here by guys who did the job and gave torque figures for the plugs. The figures are usually 19lbf.ft or 27nm. Now the manual had this to say:

Name:  DSC_8519.jpg
Views: 2869
Size:  200.9 KB

The official torque figures are substantially lower than pretty much everyone thought! Any thoughts on this? Have you perhaps torque'd yours to the common 19lbf.ft/27nm?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2016 | 12:11 PM
  #2  
DaGou's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 3
From: Myrtle Beach
Default

It is really a much to do about nothing. Could not read the posted image but if I remember right it is like 13 or something. Torquing to 20 is not a problem.

I think it was the most famous Billman who had a block laying around his house and decided to see how much torque he could apply before damage occurred. I think it was around some super high number around 75ft lbs the spark plug stripped, not the head.

If makes you feel better I just installed a set of BKR8EIX in my S/Ced AP2 at 19 LBS with no issues.

here is the thread if you have not seen this one

https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/921...e/page__st__25

it says:

For the record, I did a torque test on a stock head and stock plug. Starting at 15 ft-lbs, I increased the torque by 5 ft-lbs each time to see what the threads could handle.

I reached 80 ft-lbs, and the spark plug threaded portion broken off the spark plug. The head suffered no damage at all.

This makes 24 ft-lbs a solid number you can take to the bank.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2016 | 12:14 PM
  #3  
cdelena's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

Honda replaced a number of '00 engines because of failure from loose plugs before they upped the ridiculous 13 number to something higher. The first time I checked I saw the low number and torqued mine to 20.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2016 | 12:15 PM
  #4  
RolanTHUNDER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 234
From: In BOOST
Default

Originally Posted by DaGou
It is really a much to do about nothing. Could not read the posted image but if I remember right it is like 13 or something. Torquing to 20 is not a problem.

I think it was the most famous Billman who had a block laying around his house and decided to see how much torque he could apply before damage occurred. I think it was around some super high number around 100ft lbs the spark plug stripped, not the block.

If makes you feel better I just installed a set of BKR8EIX in my S/Ced AP2 at 19 LBS with not issues.
Right you are, 13 is the spec in imperial units. Well if that Billman example is anything to go by then I have nothing to fear as long as I stick to 2/3 of a turn like the book says

Nice! No need to adjust the gaps, right? How much of a difference do they make to your engine (response, feel, power/torque, fuel economy, etc)?
I know they're great in our cars as added defense against "knock"
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2016 | 12:18 PM
  #5  
RolanTHUNDER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 234
From: In BOOST
Default

Originally Posted by cdelena
Honda replaced a number of '00 engines because of failure from loose plugs before they upped the ridiculous 13 number to something higher. The first time I checked I saw the low number and torqued mine to 20.
Whoa, really?? I'll just make sure they're proper tight then. 20 it is.
I have an '01 but the torque figures are 13ft lbs/18nm in the manual
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2016 | 03:35 PM
  #6  
WilloW's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 2
Default

23 ft/lb. Don't frag an engine like I did because the spark plug backed itself out.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2016 | 06:11 PM
  #7  
windhund116's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,366
Likes: 1,795
Default

Honda's shop manual for S2000 says: "24Nm or 18 ft-lbs." Still seemed a little loose to me, when I first replaced the plugs. Glad this site posted more sane values like 20-24 ft-lbs.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 16, 2016 | 08:38 PM
  #8  
starchland's Avatar
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,340
Likes: 110
Default

Originally Posted by RolanTHUNDER
Originally Posted by cdelena' timestamp='1471378464' post='24040849
Honda replaced a number of '00 engines because of failure from loose plugs before they upped the ridiculous 13 number to something higher. The first time I checked I saw the low number and torqued mine to 20.
Whoa, really?? I'll just make sure they're proper tight then. 20 it is.
I have an '01 but the torque figures are 13ft lbs/18nm in the manual
A new manual will have the updated specs FYI for 00-09
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 07:00 AM
  #9  
Chuck S's Avatar
Member (Premium)
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 13,832
Likes: 1,551
From: Chesterfield VA
Default

I believe Billman posted 24lb-ft for the plugs a couple of years ago. He is one of the rare exceptions to my routine "ignore the internet and stick with the shop manual" comments.

-- Chuck
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2016 | 07:22 AM
  #10  
HarryD's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 51
From: San Francisco
Default

Honda dealers were SUPPOSED to put in a little sticker with the new torque figures during service/TSB/recalls years ago and punch a mark above your VIN in your owners manual, however.

Read the old threads on the spark plugs backing out and ruining engines. Stick to 21-24 ft-lb.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 PM.