Stock '01 AP1 Dyno Tuned with VAFC
10-09-2007, 10:16 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock '01 AP1 Dyno Tuned with VAFC
I brought my Stock '01 AP1 to Bisimoto Engineering to see what it would put down.. I have read that the motor runs very rich from the factory so I decided to get a VAFC and lean it out a little..
I was expecting more from the Baseline, but as confirmed, the AFR was really rich... With tuning done, the gains were pretty impressive, but the final numbers still seem a little low to me..
All tuning was done by myself, since I wanted to learn and also, thought it would be easy.. Upon making changes, I realized that it was not as easy as it seems and that Bisi, the owner of Bisimoto Engineering could have probably made more power with is vast experience and tuning knowledge...
Let me know what you guys think...
I was expecting more from the Baseline, but as confirmed, the AFR was really rich... With tuning done, the gains were pretty impressive, but the final numbers still seem a little low to me..
All tuning was done by myself, since I wanted to learn and also, thought it would be easy.. Upon making changes, I realized that it was not as easy as it seems and that Bisi, the owner of Bisimoto Engineering could have probably made more power with is vast experience and tuning knowledge...
Let me know what you guys think...
10-09-2007, 11:09 AM
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vspc2nr,Oct 9 2007, 10:25 AM
holy crap!! is that stock form?? I wanted to run my VAFC but now i WANT to run my VAFC!! How about a NEO?? any issues with it??
What is a NEO?
10-09-2007, 11:46 AM
#5
comparing dyno plots from one car on one dyno to another car from another dyno is worthless.
back on topic, why is the torque and horsepower down in the lower rpm range? torque in the low end is already pathetic, id hate to lose more.
back on topic, why is the torque and horsepower down in the lower rpm range? torque in the low end is already pathetic, id hate to lose more.
10-09-2007, 12:03 PM
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=slipper,Oct 9 2007, 11:46 AM]comparing dyno plots from one car on one dyno to another car from another dyno is worthless...
back on topic, why is the torque and horsepower down in the lower rpm range?
back on topic, why is the torque and horsepower down in the lower rpm range?
10-09-2007, 12:20 PM
#7
Originally Posted by slipper,Oct 9 2007, 03:46 PM
comparing dyno plots from one car on one dyno to another car from another dyno is worthless.
back on topic, why is the torque and horsepower down in the lower rpm range? torque in the low end is already pathetic, id hate to lose more.
back on topic, why is the torque and horsepower down in the lower rpm range? torque in the low end is already pathetic, id hate to lose more.
(This Dynapack reads 3 whp lower than a local Dynojet..)
Trending Topics
10-09-2007, 01:35 PM
#9
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by versionJDM,Oct 9 2007, 01:14 PM
what the AFR?
Oh well, I tried...
Next time, I will just let Bisi do the tuning... 
10-09-2007, 01:44 PM
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I realized that it was not as easy as it seems and that Bisi, the owner of Bisimoto Engineering could have probably made more power with is vast experience and tuning knowledge...