S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Swapping AP1 retainers: reuse from old ap2?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 10, 2019 | 05:42 AM
  #21  
Mauro's Avatar
Registered User
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 4
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by clio
Having said that I think Billman's advice should hold a lot of weight given his knowledge.
Of course, maybe he should get a hold of an 2004+ F20C2.

For science, you know .

Originally Posted by clio
but not unique to AP2s so I think it's just a common term that's stuck
Not even exclusive to S2000s, like the "AP2" coil packs. Which is good, as it brings the price down.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2019 | 05:54 AM
  #22  
Mr.Matchbox's Avatar
Registered User
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 555
From: Munich - Germany
Default

I think i will switch both sides.
If a retainer fails and the valve drops into the engine, the end is catstrophic. If a valve floats, it is repairable.

As a side note, i just have re-greased the shifter, makes changing and selecting the gears much more precise again. A little work that maybe avoid the catatrophic "Money shift".
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2019 | 01:01 PM
  #23  
clio's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 503
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by Mr.Matchbox
I think i will switch both sides.
If a retainer fails and the valve drops into the engine, the end is catstrophic. If a valve floats, it is repairable.
. A little work that maybe avoid the catatrophic "Money shift".
This is why I didn't change exhaust retainers:
The stock 99-03 intake retainers fail around 10,000 rpm.
The stock 99-03 exhaust retainers fail around 10,700 rpm.
Updated intake retainers lift the range to around 10,600 rpm.
So, by updating the intake retainers only the operating limit for the engine is 10,600rpm.

In changing the exhaust retainers there is increased chance of valve float, and no improvement to engine range (as the updated intake side is the weakest link).
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2019 | 02:51 AM
  #24  
rpg51's Avatar
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,296
Likes: 260
From: Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by clio
This is why I didn't change exhaust retainers:
The stock 99-03 intake retainers fail around 10,000 rpm.
The stock 99-03 exhaust retainers fail around 10,700 rpm.
Updated intake retainers lift the range to around 10,600 rpm.
So, by updating the intake retainers only the operating limit for the engine is 10,600rpm.

In changing the exhaust retainers there is increased chance of valve float, and no improvement to engine range (as the updated intake side is the weakest link).
This.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2019 | 03:57 AM
  #25  
Billman250's Avatar
Moderator
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 120 Days
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,388
Likes: 1,841
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Exhaust valve-to-piston contact at 10,700.
AP2 retainers on the exhaust side will lower that number

Yes you can do it. And yes Honda put them in AP1s overseas (they are not going to continue to make AP1 retainers with the advent of the AP2 retainer)

All this matters ONLY in the case of a wrong-gear-mechanical-over rev.

In the USA, it seems everyone banks on this. Abroad, they bank on their ability to operate the car properly.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2019 | 03:08 AM
  #26  
Mr.Matchbox's Avatar
Registered User
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 555
From: Munich - Germany
Default

of course i bank on my abillity to drive the car properly. i am 47 years now and drive manuall all my life, never automatic, plus motorcycles. i think i know how to shift.

@ clio: the rpm number for the updated retainers on the exhaust side is missing?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2019 | 03:31 AM
  #27  
Chuck S's Avatar
Member (Premium)
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 13,832
Likes: 1,550
From: Chesterfield VA
Default

Don't count on it!

-- Chuck
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2019 | 03:40 AM
  #28  
Mr.Matchbox's Avatar
Registered User
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 555
From: Munich - Germany
Default

thats why i re-greased the shifter to get smooth, precise (!) shifts again. works really well.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2019 | 12:42 AM
  #29  
Mr.Matchbox's Avatar
Registered User
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 555
From: Munich - Germany
Default

Originally Posted by clio
This is why I didn't change exhaust retainers:
The stock 99-03 intake retainers fail around 10,000 rpm.
The stock 99-03 exhaust retainers fail around 10,700 rpm.
Updated intake retainers lift the range to around 10,600 rpm.
So, by updating the intake retainers only the operating limit for the engine is 10,600rpm.

In changing the exhaust retainers there is increased chance of valve float, and no improvement to engine range (as the updated intake side is the weakest link).
sorry for maybe being annoying, but i am still curios: where are the rpm numbers for the exhaust valves with the updated retainers?

and what is the source for this rpm numbers? Honda R&D? Link?

edit: fail means the retainers start to crack, i guess. what are the rpm numbers for valve float?

Last edited by Mr.Matchbox; Apr 17, 2019 at 12:53 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2019 | 12:54 AM
  #30  
clio's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 503
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by Mr.Matchbox
sorry for maybe being annoying, but i am still curios: where are the rpm numbers for the exhaust valves with the updated retainers?
I do not know.

and what is the source for this rpm numbers? Honda R&D? Link?
I doubt there would be any info from Honda when components fail above operating range, at least not in the public domain. The rpm figures have been quoted by Billman in a number of threads. I think many on this forum, including me, take his info as gospel on all things S2K.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 AM.