S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Swapping AP1 retainers: reuse from old ap2?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-10-2019, 05:42 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Mauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 3
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by clio
Having said that I think Billman's advice should hold a lot of weight given his knowledge.
Of course, maybe he should get a hold of an 2004+ F20C2.

For science, you know .

Originally Posted by clio
but not unique to AP2s so I think it's just a common term that's stuck
Not even exclusive to S2000s, like the "AP2" coil packs. Which is good, as it brings the price down.
Old 04-10-2019, 05:54 AM
  #22  
Registered User

 
Mr.Matchbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Munich - Germany
Posts: 1,131
Received 271 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

I think i will switch both sides.
If a retainer fails and the valve drops into the engine, the end is catstrophic. If a valve floats, it is repairable.

As a side note, i just have re-greased the shifter, makes changing and selecting the gears much more precise again. A little work that maybe avoid the catatrophic "Money shift".
Old 04-10-2019, 01:01 PM
  #23  

 
clio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 503
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr.Matchbox
I think i will switch both sides.
If a retainer fails and the valve drops into the engine, the end is catstrophic. If a valve floats, it is repairable.
. A little work that maybe avoid the catatrophic "Money shift".
This is why I didn't change exhaust retainers:
The stock 99-03 intake retainers fail around 10,000 rpm.
The stock 99-03 exhaust retainers fail around 10,700 rpm.
Updated intake retainers lift the range to around 10,600 rpm.
So, by updating the intake retainers only the operating limit for the engine is 10,600rpm.

In changing the exhaust retainers there is increased chance of valve float, and no improvement to engine range (as the updated intake side is the weakest link).
The following users liked this post:
rpg51 (04-11-2019)
Old 04-11-2019, 02:51 AM
  #24  

 
rpg51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,295
Received 256 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by clio
This is why I didn't change exhaust retainers:
The stock 99-03 intake retainers fail around 10,000 rpm.
The stock 99-03 exhaust retainers fail around 10,700 rpm.
Updated intake retainers lift the range to around 10,600 rpm.
So, by updating the intake retainers only the operating limit for the engine is 10,600rpm.

In changing the exhaust retainers there is increased chance of valve float, and no improvement to engine range (as the updated intake side is the weakest link).
This.
Old 04-11-2019, 03:57 AM
  #25  
Moderator

 
Billman250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 22,001
Received 1,244 Likes on 759 Posts
Default

Exhaust valve-to-piston contact at 10,700.
AP2 retainers on the exhaust side will lower that number

Yes you can do it. And yes Honda put them in AP1s overseas (they are not going to continue to make AP1 retainers with the advent of the AP2 retainer)

All this matters ONLY in the case of a wrong-gear-mechanical-over rev.

In the USA, it seems everyone banks on this. Abroad, they bank on their ability to operate the car properly.
The following users liked this post:
Hertz Donut (04-11-2019)
Old 04-14-2019, 03:08 AM
  #26  
Registered User

 
Mr.Matchbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Munich - Germany
Posts: 1,131
Received 271 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

of course i bank on my abillity to drive the car properly. i am 47 years now and drive manuall all my life, never automatic, plus motorcycles. i think i know how to shift.

@ clio: the rpm number for the updated retainers on the exhaust side is missing?
Old 04-14-2019, 03:31 AM
  #27  

 
Chuck S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chesterfield VA
Posts: 12,523
Received 1,131 Likes on 994 Posts
Default

Don't count on it!

-- Chuck
Old 04-14-2019, 03:40 AM
  #28  
Registered User

 
Mr.Matchbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Munich - Germany
Posts: 1,131
Received 271 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

thats why i re-greased the shifter to get smooth, precise (!) shifts again. works really well.
Old 04-17-2019, 12:42 AM
  #29  
Registered User

 
Mr.Matchbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Munich - Germany
Posts: 1,131
Received 271 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by clio
This is why I didn't change exhaust retainers:
The stock 99-03 intake retainers fail around 10,000 rpm.
The stock 99-03 exhaust retainers fail around 10,700 rpm.
Updated intake retainers lift the range to around 10,600 rpm.
So, by updating the intake retainers only the operating limit for the engine is 10,600rpm.

In changing the exhaust retainers there is increased chance of valve float, and no improvement to engine range (as the updated intake side is the weakest link).
sorry for maybe being annoying, but i am still curios: where are the rpm numbers for the exhaust valves with the updated retainers?

and what is the source for this rpm numbers? Honda R&D? Link?

edit: fail means the retainers start to crack, i guess. what are the rpm numbers for valve float?

Last edited by Mr.Matchbox; 04-17-2019 at 12:53 AM.
Old 04-17-2019, 12:54 AM
  #30  

 
clio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 503
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr.Matchbox
sorry for maybe being annoying, but i am still curios: where are the rpm numbers for the exhaust valves with the updated retainers?
I do not know.

and what is the source for this rpm numbers? Honda R&D? Link?
I doubt there would be any info from Honda when components fail above operating range, at least not in the public domain. The rpm figures have been quoted by Billman in a number of threads. I think many on this forum, including me, take his info as gospel on all things S2K.


Quick Reply: Swapping AP1 retainers: reuse from old ap2?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:51 PM.