S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Thinner headgasket?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 10, 2013 | 04:38 PM
  #1  
TheProfessor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Default Thinner headgasket?

Anyone do this? or get the head decked? power number? worth doing?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2013 | 04:40 PM
  #2  
CrAzYNeSs's Avatar
Member
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 1
From: Mission Viejo, CA
Default

Wouldn't that increase the piston compression ratio but effectively also lowering your redline to avoid piston/valve contact?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2013 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
TheProfessor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Default

i would think that it would increase compression maybe making some kind of power increase. Not sure if it would cut rpm thou
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2013 | 05:42 PM
  #4  
RacerXI's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,650
Likes: 20
From: Dothan, AL
Default

Increase Compression, slight bump in power due to compression and also could induce knock. You also decrease your piston to valve clearance.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2013 | 05:58 PM
  #5  
Yoohoo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RacerXI
Increase Compression, slight bump in power due to compression and also could induce knock. You also decrease your piston to valve clearance.
Bang on the money.

/thread
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2013 | 09:02 PM
  #6  
TheProfessor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Default

how much would something like this cost?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2013 | 11:00 PM
  #7  
hatchhero's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Default

Atomic posted this on my thread in the NA section. http://cosworthperformance.com/store...gory=72&page=1

Im looking into doing this also, but I need to confirm that 76mm is the OEM thickness on a OEM headgasket, so I know how low I can go. I would maybe go with a 48mm or something like that, but racer is right
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 11, 2013 | 09:09 AM
  #8  
TopGear's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 15
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by CrAzYNeSs
Wouldn't that increase the piston compression ratio but effectively also lowering your redline to avoid piston/valve contact?
On a stock engine, I don't think piston to valve contact happens until 10.7k rpm, so there should be at least a little wiggle room with decreasing that tolerance.

Not that I would go through all the trouble...
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 09:45 AM
  #9  
deepbluejh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by hatchhero
Atomic posted this on my thread in the NA section. http://cosworthperfo...egory=72&page=1

Im looking into doing this also, but I need to confirm that 76mm is the OEM thickness on a OEM headgasket, so I know how low I can go. I would maybe go with a 48mm or something like that, but racer is right
That 76mm is another dimension. The OEM thickness is the neighborhood if 1mm, give or take. You might could trim a few tenths of a mm off that, but there quickly comes a point where you are not getting adequate sealing of the head if the gasket is too thin.

Regardless, I suspect the gains from this would be minimal while the risks would be much greater. I would look elsewhere for power.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 05:45 PM
  #10  
05thumper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Default

Gasket?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:49 AM.