S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Times For Sc And Tc

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 20, 2003 | 02:49 PM
  #1  
camerons2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: somerset
Default Times For Sc And Tc

does anyone know wich makes the car better in the qm? if so what are the times I would love to know? please post your times here if u have ran your car?
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2003 | 03:11 PM
  #2  
spapdx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,820
Likes: 2
From: Gresham, OR
Default

Way too many variables to compare the two....but if you are just looking for 1/4 mile times thats cool
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2003 | 07:49 PM
  #3  
Randman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Default

I would like to know this too, I heard that the superchargers run around a 13.5, please prove that wrong for me!
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2003 | 08:07 PM
  #4  
JoeD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by Randman
I would like to know this too, I heard that the superchargers run around a 13.5, please prove that wrong for me!
Well, that seems to be true. All of the magazine reviews so far of SCed S2Ks and a member on this forum running his SCed S2K, they do not seem much faster that stock. Improved E.T.s by less than half a second, and traps improved by only 4-6 mph. Sorry...thats not impressive at all.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2003 | 08:23 PM
  #5  
vodalus's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 523
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

The times would be much better if there weren't major traction problems.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 09:57 AM
  #6  
Anthonymv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia
Default

I have seen some SC S2K's run 13.2's ect and have heard of Turbo S2k's hitting mid 12's. If you get a nicer setup (bigger turbo, stand alone ect) and run 8psi you should easily get mid 12's with a turbo setup. I assume part of the difference is that the turbos make more torque and more power in general, especially under 6000 after they reach full boost at 3500-4000. -Anthony
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 11:51 AM
  #7  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 1
From: Glendale
Default

The fastest I have seen on this website for SC is 13.1-13 flat. For the turbo setup I saw a 12.3.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 21, 2003 | 02:58 PM
  #8  
camerons2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: somerset
Default

thanx alot!! that really helps my decision but if I where going to buy a sc or tc I prob would pick the sc because I think it would last longer and be better for the engine. I guess it just depends on how u treat the TC I guess.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 06:05 PM
  #9  
Anthonymv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia
Default

TC would be reliable if tuned properly and if a level of boost that is not pushing it depending on the compression. A properly tuned turbo s2k at 6psi will be fine, maybe even 8psi. There are more parts that have to work together to make it run smooth but if done properly with correct tuning, the car should be as driveable and reliable as a SC S2k, not too mention more powerful. Another problem is people cheapout on wastgegates and turbos and then complain when they break. -Anthony
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2003 | 06:08 PM
  #10  
Anthonymv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia
Default

I have seen similar numbers as Fanamn says. The people driving the Vortech S2K are not good drivers obviously if someone can get a half a second better. A Vortech S2k is a legitamate C5, M3 and 911 competitor.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 PM.