[QUOTE]Originally posted by Hams2000
[B]That dyno graph is a joke. I can answer all your questions now. It doenst make the idle rough at all. The valve train noise is more apparent because the valve clearances are not as close at the OEM. The midrange power gains are awesome and the car really pulls hard all the way to redline. I gained 12 rwhp over the OEM cams and I thought they are most worth the price.

 

9906,
I honestly think the Cams would work nicely with the cams.. I think I said something to the affect that the VAFC would probably yield similar results at a fraction of the price. I think trying the ECU with my setup would be awesome. It's definately on my list of things to purchase.


Chris

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Hams2000
[B]9906,

 

OOOPSSS!!! Sorry, I meant that the Cams would work nicely with an aftermarket ECU! MY BAD!

Hehe

 

Hams, do you have a dyno of your setup? Also, are the cams available for purchase anywhere? I'm curious what the results would be with a stock car and just the cams and VAFC. thanks.

 

My baseline was 193.7 with DC header and HKS exhaust. I added the Vafc and made 211.something. Then I switched to the EMS and made 224. Lastly I ran the Toda cams making 237. I have since switched out to the Vafc again and now I am running all Spoon header/exhaust. I dont know the difference, but the car feels really strong topend. I will make a pull sometime this month so we'll see for sure.

Chris

 

Imagine those factory freak S2000s getting over 200 rwhp stock.

 

exactly. Just think of the possibilities if you ran the Spoon pistons and head gasket. You'd be running serious compression with all this power. I think it would be most interesting.

chris