S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Vortech still running lean, need to get Adj FMU on a budget need ideas :)

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-07-2004, 01:44 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
AmyAngeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Vortech still running lean, need to get Adj FMU on a budget need ideas :)

hi again everyone, First off I wanted to say thanks to everyone before who helped me with my Vortech and Vafc-2 problem last week. Once again I headed out to get my SC tuned and what do ya know its running SUPER lean, right after 6k RPM my af its like 15.01. Church was able to help me tune the Vafc to about 14.33 which is still too lean. The limited tuning he was able to do gained some hp and tq at the top end but i lost some in the bottom and mid range.

My problem is i'm looking for an aftermarket adj. raising rate fuel regulator to replace my stock vortech FMU that isn't that expensive. The Vortech SFMU costs $306 and a bit much for me right now. I found a B.E.G.I. regulator but they cost around $260 and i hadn't found any S2k's that have tried it and used it to see how well they work.

I know my last alternative is to get the 12:1 recalibration kit and try to retune it with that. but i was hoping on finding an adj. one that isn't going to cost much over $200.

Any ideas on what other brands i'm overlooking or should be looking into? Thanks again ;D

~~@my


Old 06-07-2004, 02:56 PM
  #2  
Former Moderator

 
Slows2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mother F'in TN
Posts: 43,878
Received 298 Likes on 277 Posts
Default

Sounds like you have done your homework on FMU's. The only other company that I know of that makes one is Jackson Racing, But I don't know what rate there unit is. You may be able to pick one up used, as lots of Jackson owners remove them and add big injectors/hondata.

I don't know if a different rising rate FMU is going to help you. The 10:1 FMU Vortech provides with the kit is allready at 125psi @7.5psi of boost. Even with a different rate FMU, the limiting factor on how much fuel is entering the engine is the injectors. (which were never meant for fuel pressure that high) The problem with high fuel pressure, is that as pressure increases, volume decreases. The injectors are also not able to effectively close, but are "blown" open by the high fuel pressure.

It looks to me the best answer (most $) would be to add AEM EMS, But the EMS is not a perfect system. You are lucky that you can use Church, who has been the best AEM EMS tuner for the S. Other options include the E-manage. (also not perfect)

What did UL reccomend for you to do?

With the AF that lean, I wouldn't go exploring past 4000rpm any time soon.
Old 06-07-2004, 03:24 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
AmyAngeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

he suggested that i get either a new disc for the vortech fmu, which he says 12:1 should do since it adds about 20% more fuel. or an adj regulator. Which is better since he can tune it more precisely. i figured an adj would be the better option but seeing how expensive they run. i wasn't sure if there were other brands i could consider. I had considered the Emanage and AEM originally but due to the high costs on those components right now i can't really afford to go that route.

yep i know i need to bring my a/f down. he said i would want it to be around 13.1. he said just about every Vortech he's tuned has come up lean. I had figured Vortech to fix the problem with so many previous systems sold that were showing to be really lean and that i would be lucky to actually run fairly normal but no luck.

but before i went and ordered the 12:1 recalibration kit, i wanted to see if there any other option that won't cost that much.

~~@my
Old 06-07-2004, 03:52 PM
  #4  

 
honda9krpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

12:1 will results in around 91 psi in fuel pressure at 7psi of boost (ie around 9krpm)

13:1 will be around 98psi of fuel pressure

are you sure you wan't to take this short cut?
Old 06-07-2004, 04:48 PM
  #5  
Moderator

 
AusS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30,810
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

If your problem is not enough fuel and your injector duty cycle is not too high I would suggest an E-manage (predictable huh?).

For about $400 (cheaper used) you should get the E-manage and injector harness which will let you drive the injectors a bit longer in the higher revs. It can also replace your MAP limiter and do some ignition control but it's not necessary.

The AEM EMS is a better option but at 3 times the price a bit hard to justify.
Old 06-07-2004, 05:00 PM
  #6  
Former Moderator

 
Slows2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mother F'in TN
Posts: 43,878
Received 298 Likes on 277 Posts
Default

H9K, Your math is a bit off. The stock fuel pressure with the FMU installed is about 50psi, at idle. Fuel pressure without the FMU is lower, around 40psi. The FMU adds a restriction and increases pressure. With a 10:1 FMU, fuel pressure is 125psi@7.5psi of boost. 50+10x7.5=125psi.

12:1 FMU =140psi@7.5psi of boost.
13:1 FMU =147.5psi@ 7.5psi of boost.
Old 06-07-2004, 05:10 PM
  #7  

 
honda9krpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ya you are right
I forgot the 43 back ground fuel pressure

sorry got distracted with work
FMU
10:1 = 10psi per psi of boost
12:1 = 12psi per psi of boost

Stock FPR
1psi per psi of boost

Background fuel pressure 43

so for 7psi of boost with the 12:1 FMU and stock FPR
43+ 7 + 12x7
=134

You guys got the general idea anyway
Old 06-07-2004, 08:04 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
AmyAngeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks everyone for your input , because i've already invested in the vafc, and can't afford to go emanage or aem,i'm going to try the SFMU, to increase the basic static fuel pressure, lower the raising pressure from 125psi @7.5lbs of boost to around 100psi. it sounded like that's what the SFMU can do for me hopefully. another user on here is selling his with the fittings. it's so complicated but i'm learning as i go. and have a much better understanding of the fuel settings on FI cars. What do you guys think? would it be ok for now?
Old 06-07-2004, 08:15 PM
  #9  
Former Moderator

 
Slows2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mother F'in TN
Posts: 43,878
Received 298 Likes on 277 Posts
Default

if you go with the SFMU, I'd get it dyno'd with the wideband while setting it. It may work, but I don't think anyone here has tried. Post back if you get the AF in a safe range. I'd be interested.
Old 06-07-2004, 08:46 PM
  #10  
Moderator

 
AusS2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30,810
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I think you're mad doing FPR tuning.

Look at your A/F graph; it's all over the place. All you can do with an FPR is raise or lower the whole line (by changing static pressure) or change the angle of the line (by changing the ratio). Nothing you can do with an FPR will smooth it.

To do this properly you're going to have to spend some dollars on tuning regardless of the method.


Quick Reply: Vortech still running lean, need to get Adj FMU on a budget need ideas :)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:38 PM.