S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

vtec disengage point?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 04:48 AM
  #11  
mxt_77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 3
From: Wylie, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Wisconsin S2k,Mar 21 2005, 03:47 AM
I do know that in stock form, the vtec disengagement point is LOWER than the engagement point.
Do you know what the disengagement point is? If not, how do you know that it is lower than the engagement point?

I'm not claiming that it isn't lower (since it makes sense for it to be a bit lower), I'm just wondering what the actual value is. In all honesty, I could see Honda setting the crossover to a set value (for engagement and disengagement) just to simplify their own life. I know, however, that the VAFC gives you the ability to set the disengagement point lower than the engagement point, so maybe the stock ECU does the same thing.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 06:37 PM
  #12  
spotch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Default

so I guess we're back at square one.... (not being sure what the disengagement rpm)
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 07:42 PM
  #13  
ultimate lurker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 1
From: You wish
Default

Honda puts a deliberate hysteresis into its VTEC activation/deactivation protocol. While I don't know what the disengagement point is for the S2000, it is lower than the activation point. This is to prevent rapid switching back and forth if you were to be holding steady throttle in a corner, etc.

Not only is there a hysteresis based upon rpm, but it is also load dependent. At high loads (low vacuum) VTEC activates lower, at low loads (higher vacuum to a point), VTEC activates at a higher rpm. You can confirm this by noting how much later VTEC activates at very high altitudes (say 5000+ ft). We notice this driving from sea level up the Angeles Crest highway.

UL
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 08:18 PM
  #14  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

UL is correct. VTEC engagement is based on several factors, including vacuum and RPM. Gentle acceleration causes VTEC engagement at a higher RPM because vacuum is higher (or as UL might put it, the load is lower).

What I'm unsure about is whether or not the disengagement point also varies with load. If we accelerate gently to 6500 RPM, VTEC will not engage, but if we then floor it, it does engage. If we back off at 7000 RPM, does it then disengage because the load dropped, or are we locked into VTEC until the RPM's drop below some fixed disengagement point? Guess I'll have to play around a little next time I take the car out to see what happens. (This isn't the kind of thing I'd be doing in normal driving.)

Anyone already tried this?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dan_uk
S2000 Forced Induction
1
Apr 20, 2014 12:56 PM
doddg
S2000 Under The Hood
19
Apr 8, 2014 10:51 PM
6262
S2000 Engine Management
16
Aug 23, 2013 11:46 AM
d.h
S2000 Under The Hood
8
Jul 28, 2005 04:24 PM
TunedS2000
S2000 Talk
1
Jun 20, 2004 08:48 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 AM.