what's worse?
Originally posted by Wesmaster
Sorry, I was referring to Shing's original question. "Which is better hot and dry or not so hot and very humid? "
Wesmaster
Sorry, I was referring to Shing's original question. "Which is better hot and dry or not so hot and very humid? "
Wesmaster
But I donno... some one commented to me that the dyno was in STD not SAE, therefore not corrected. But I asked carboy and they said it was infact correct. so I am not sure.....
-shing
Best performance/Cool dry Air! 0-30% humidity @ 60-65 Degrees @ sealevel. (Ideal) Colder is denser. You notice this dramatically in two stroke engines.
Worst performance/Hot Humid Air! 45-100% humidity @ 85-whatever @ anything above 2500'.
Worst performance/Hot Humid Air! 45-100% humidity @ 85-whatever @ anything above 2500'.
Hot is bad - cold is good;
Cool air not only improves air density (mass O2) to the engine but also increases "thermal efficiency" of the engine.
Hot and Humid is bad due to temperature but Humidity is OK;
I am sure you have noticed how an engine tends to feel stronger on a rainy day. The water vapor in the inlet air expands as the combustion process takes place augmenting the pressure increase in the cylinder delivering more torque.
Cool air not only improves air density (mass O2) to the engine but also increases "thermal efficiency" of the engine.
Hot and Humid is bad due to temperature but Humidity is OK;
I am sure you have noticed how an engine tends to feel stronger on a rainy day. The water vapor in the inlet air expands as the combustion process takes place augmenting the pressure increase in the cylinder delivering more torque.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DJ Qube
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
3
Jun 6, 2002 08:21 PM




