S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

a car thread, 911 to be precise

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-24-2018, 05:40 PM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
boltonblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: bolton
Posts: 31,552
Received 3,520 Likes on 2,381 Posts
Default a car thread, 911 to be precise

OK I don't get the Porsche 911.
I tried to talk my dad into buying one when I was a young kid because they looked cool.
They were only like 3 or 4 grand ( although at a point when my dad probably made 7 or 8 in year.

Over time the fascination went away and I didn't really track them.
I do know there are something like 30 current varieties.
I look on bring a trailer and I can't make heads or tails out of the bidding. There is like thirteen on there right now.
oil vs H2O cooled, turbo vs normally aspirated, RWD v AWD, cab vs hardtop, std v tiptronic. widebody etc etc etc.
I guess I should be happy I don't have the Porsche bug since I am still happily married. ( although if the right 928 came along I might be in trouble,)
there is a nice looking 77 930 turbo which instantly drew big bids. although I bet a stock stripper 911 of recent vintage could probably beat it given 40 years of development.
I'm sure that GT3 with twice the horsepower would be just a touch quicker.... maybe you know, cuz I'm guessing here.
Old 01-25-2018, 03:28 PM
  #2  

 
S2KRAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lewes, DE
Posts: 8,343
Likes: 0
Received 705 Likes on 477 Posts
Default

I detailed and drove a 2016 911 GT3 RS. It is very fast.
Old 01-26-2018, 02:09 AM
  #3  

 
MsPerky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 43,535
Received 2,596 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Default

That must have been a blast, Ray! Always been a favorite of mine. I'd probably buy one if money were no object and I were driving more to really enjoy it. I did look at a few used ones years ago with a friend who owned one, but ended up buying the first S instead. Not sorry.
Old 01-26-2018, 04:02 AM
  #4  

 
Legal Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canton, MA
Posts: 34,103
Received 106 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Jerry, after reading your post, I'm not sure what part you don't get.

The original turbo goes for big bucks because it is a classic. People like the performance, but the high prices are more about the car's place in history.

The 911 has been around since the 60s. All this time Porsche has been revising the
model and introducing what really are new cars that look like the previous car. As with any car manufacturer, some of the cars were better than others. Some had more problems than others. The older versions are lighter than the later versions. They are a more direct driving experience with little to no insulation or perhaps separation of the driver from the road. Some special versions were made in limited numbers and became instant classics. I still remember people buying aftermarket whale tails and wide body kits and the wide wheels for their pedestrian 911s to try to achieve "the look" of the specials.

The 911 always did more with less. Compare road tests of 911s with the other high end sports cars of the same period. The 911s always seemed to have a performance edge over cars that had more horsepower or at least bigger engines. They cost a bit more than the Corvette, but often outperformed the Ferrari for half the price.

In the early 1970s, when every car in the US was slower due to emissions requirements, Porsche introduced cars with electronic fuel injection that had more power than the previous models. Everyone wanted the 1973 911. And they came in three different models so you could find one to fit your budget and driving style.

In competition they were difficult to beat. Privateers had as much success as the factory. And the factory prototypes were world beaters. I still remember watching LeMans races on tv and seeing what looked like stock 911s running with all the different high end factory race cars. It was a very impressive sight.

I'm no 911 expert, so for specifics about the different models, I'd consult the marque experts or buy one of the many books about the history of the 911.
Old 01-26-2018, 04:25 AM
  #5  

Thread Starter
 
boltonblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: bolton
Posts: 31,552
Received 3,520 Likes on 2,381 Posts
Default

If I had to price a 911 I'd clueless for the most part.
Some hit bring a trailer and the first bid out of the gate is 20 grand. ( not a vintage 930)
It looks unremarkable to me. other slinger at 5 then 6500 then 7 then slowly work there way up.
it's the subtleties I don't get.
Old 01-26-2018, 05:01 AM
  #6  

 
dlq04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Mish-she-gan
Posts: 41,250
Received 4,960 Likes on 3,005 Posts
Default

Bill, well said. The UK magazine Classic & Sports Car has had some excellent issues in the past that compare the various models. As you say, not every P car was great, while some were outstanding, and the variety over the years is mind boggling.

Last edited by dlq04; 01-26-2018 at 11:50 AM.
Old 01-26-2018, 09:37 AM
  #7  

 
poorshoeless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lewis Center OH
Posts: 1,895
Received 171 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

911 Carrera (Type)
2017-> (991.2)
2012-2016 (991)
2009-2012 (997.2)
2005-2008 (997)
1999-2004 (996)

- Avoid the 996 and 997 if possible due to IMS. Must have Sport Chrono (option 640) if you are getting one with PDK. This option cannot be retrofit after 2012. This option is less important if you can find one with a manual transmission. Porsche was making type 997.2 and 991 in 2012 at the same time. Type 991 was the last 911 that come with a NA engine, all 911 after 991 has "turbo".
Old 01-26-2018, 03:04 PM
  #8  
tof

 
tof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long Beach, MS
Posts: 14,952
Received 1,916 Likes on 1,308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boltonblue
If I had to price a 911 I'd clueless for the most part.
Some hit bring a trailer and the first bid out of the gate is 20 grand. ( not a vintage 930)
It looks unremarkable to me. other slinger at 5 then 6500 then 7 then slowly work there way up.
it's the subtleties I don't get.
It's pretty much like a lot of other models. A nice 66 Mustang will fetch maybe 25K but a Shelby 350 might go for ten times as much. Or compare the price of a 2+2 automatic Jag E-type or a Series 3 coupe to that of a Series 1 roadster.
Old 01-26-2018, 04:48 PM
  #9  

 
S2KRAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lewes, DE
Posts: 8,343
Likes: 0
Received 705 Likes on 477 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MsPerky
That must have been a blast, Ray! Always been a favorite of mine. I'd probably buy one if money were no object and I were driving more to really enjoy it. I did look at a few used ones years ago with a friend who owned one, but ended up buying the first S instead. Not sorry.
It was fun but not my cup of tea. Way too much HP for driving on our roads and the damn seats were very difficult to get in and out of. And the cost was 242K.
Old 01-27-2018, 04:21 AM
  #10  

Thread Starter
 
boltonblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: bolton
Posts: 31,552
Received 3,520 Likes on 2,381 Posts
Default

Ray, are you asserting that there is such a thing as too much horsepower?



Quick Reply: a car thread, 911 to be precise



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:43 PM.