I'm no English major but
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Marblehead
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Dad at age 84 keeps us in stitches with his Archie Bunkers. One he can't ever seem to master is threadmill instead of treadmill. Being that English once was my second language, I had my own struggles with phonics.
#23
Originally Posted by Chazmo,Feb 4 2007, 09:27 AM
Seriously, if you head up into northern Maine, you might actually have trouble speaking with the fishermen and other locals there.
#24
Originally Posted by Chazmo,Feb 4 2007, 09:27 AM
Seriously, if you head up into northern Maine, you might actually have trouble speaking with the fishermen and other locals there.
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: EstesPark/BocaRaton
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by S1997
The nuclear > nucular (/ul>lu/) change is common in languages, too. /l/ and /r/ are classified in phonology as liquids.
HPH
#28
Originally Posted by DrCloud,Feb 4 2007, 11:05 AM
Originally Posted by S1997
The nuclear > nucular (/ul>lu/) change is common in languages, too. /l/ and /r/ are classified in phonology as liquids.
HPH
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Flintstone GA
Posts: 12,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure most of y'all are familiar with this Southern contraction for "you all". But I'm wondering about the prevalence of the variant we have around here:
You'uns.
Jim, any insight on this one?
You'uns.
Jim, any insight on this one?
#30
Originally Posted by raymo19,Feb 4 2007, 11:28 AM
I'm sure most of y'all are familiar with this Southern contraction for "you all". But I'm wondering about the prevalence of the variant we have around here:
You'uns.
Jim, any insight on this one?
You'uns.
Jim, any insight on this one?