S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Are Millennials overly sensitive?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 12:07 PM
  #11  
MemphiS2k's Avatar
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 99
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill
Memphis, Cody and uhOh, I appreciate your participation inn this discussion. It seems the three of you agree with the "overy sensitive" designation. Do you think it is fair to attribute that characteristic broadly?
I don't. The span of a generation is far to wide to attribute to the entire group.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 12:11 PM
  #12  
dlq04's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 45,832
Likes: 8,338
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

I don't know who started all the labeling of generations but I suspect it was someone in the Marketing Department.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 03:56 PM
  #13  
Lovetodrive2000's Avatar
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 35,982
Likes: 211
From: 262 miles N of the Dragon
Default

What are millennial's doing in here anyway?

Too young to be vintage!

Just stirring up trouble!
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 04:10 PM
  #14  
MemphiS2k's Avatar
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 99
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Lovetodrive2000
What are millennial's doing in here anyway?

Too young to be vintage!

Just stirring up trouble!
Antique cars tags in my state are 25+ y/o cars, so I think millennials 25-34 should count as vintage.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 04:51 PM
  #15  
boltonblue's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 37,533
Likes: 6,352
From: bolton
Default

there will be no participation trophies awarded in the vintage forum.....
The boomers grew up in a much more competitive environment. I think it put a much sharper edge on us vs the millennials.
But we boomers also grew up in a far more isolated world whereas they came of age highly connected.
That connected world may have heightened their sensitivity to the written word.
It is odd that there seems to be such a challenge with recognizing what is real in that connected world.

The civil rights movement was an outgrowth of boomer generation. I think millennials ( and their cameras) have expanded that horizon.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 05:41 AM
  #16  
Legal Bill's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

Everyone is welcome in Vintage, of course.

I'm most surprised at how few of the "Vintage" aged folks are participating (substantively) in this discussion.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 05:47 AM
  #17  
Legal Bill's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by boltonblue
there will be no participation trophies awarded in the vintage forum.....
The boomers grew up in a much more competitive environment. I think it put a much sharper edge on us vs the millennials.
But we boomers also grew up in a far more isolated world whereas they came of age highly connected.
That connected world may have heightened their sensitivity to the written word.
It is odd that there seems to be such a challenge with recognizing what is real in that connected world.

The civil rights movement was an outgrowth of boomer generation. I think millennials ( and their cameras) have expanded that horizon.
Some would argue that the Millennials are more isolated as a result of the technology.

So how far do the civil rights go? Privacy is essentially dead. It seems that the new horizon of civil rights is an expansion of the right to not hear or see things that you don't want to see or hear regardless of what those things are or where you might hear or see them. Is the expansion of this "right" genuine or just a convenient way to limit others' freedom of expression?
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 05:55 AM
  #18  
TsukubaCody's Avatar
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 467
Default

Originally Posted by boltonblue
there will be no participation trophies awarded in the vintage forum.....

Millennials never asked for participation trophies, those were given us to by parents/teachers/etc., blame boomers, gen Xer's, etc.

The boomers grew up in a much more competitive environment. I think it put a much sharper edge on us vs the millennials.

What do you mean? Millennials grew up in a much more global economy, with much higher education & experience demands placed on us to find a job. Additionally every job domestically has much more competition as a result of the internet & the ever 'shrinking' world. I compete with people across my local metro area, state & the US at large when I apply for any job, because the internet has made the talent pool for a given position so much larger. The days of getting a high school diploma, walking down to the Ford/GM/Chrysler/AMC/etc., plant, getting hired & making a livable wage are long gone.

But we boomers also grew up in a far more isolated world whereas they came of age highly connected.

Agreed.

It is odd that there seems to be such a challenge with recognizing what is real in that connected world.

Hateful speech via text is still hateful speech. People saying awful things on the internet is probably a more accurate marker of what they really think than what they'd say in person (well, prior to Trump's America).
Could you please expand on a few things in this? My responses in bold, hopefully that will shed light on what exactly I'm not following.

Originally Posted by Legal Bill
So how far do the civil rights go? Privacy is essentially dead. It seems that the new horizon of civil rights is an expansion of the right to not hear or see things that you don't want to see or hear regardless of what those things are or where you might hear or see them. Is the expansion of this "right" genuine or just a convenient way to limit others' freedom of expression?
The latter, unfortunately.
​​​​​​​
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 05:58 AM
  #19  
trapper's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 14
From: Exeter, NH
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill
......I'm most surprised at how few of the "Vintage" aged folks are participating (substantively) in this discussion.
Being a member of "The Silent Generation" I'm doing just that: being silent and lurking ...for the present...
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 06:05 AM
  #20  
Kyras's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45,917
Likes: 5,420
From: Loveland, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill
Everyone is welcome in Vintage, of course.

I'm most surprised at how few of the "Vintage" aged folks are participating (substantively) in this discussion.
The definition of milleniums I'll use is "born from the early 1980s to the early 2000s". With that in mind, and not basing my opinion on anything but those I've met in the age group, I find them more interested in life outside their bubble and more reactive to it. Does that mean they're more sensitive? My kids were born in 1987 and 1988. They are both way more concerned about the world than I ever was. I just lived in my bubble. One of my kids is very concerned about animals of the earth and spends her spare time volunteering to help animals that are in risk of becoming extinct. One is very concerned with the earth's health, like waste and global warming. They have grown up computers and information that I didn't have. I meet "kids" who volunteer at a hospital. They are gungho to help people along their path to be nurses and doctors.

The media gives a different view than mine of millenniums. If people on here based their opinions on real "kids" that they personally know instead of what they've read, I wonder if their opinions would be different.

Their concerns may seem overly sensitive to us old folks but I think it's just the way it should be. It's a new generation.

Last edited by Kyras; Dec 7, 2016 at 06:11 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:04 PM.