New Orleans redevelopment
Originally Posted by dean,Sep 16 2005, 12:13 PM
From what I understand, undoing some of the artificial routing of the river is being considered. I'm no environmental engineer, but I'm guessing this may require the reclamation of those wetlands/flood plain. If that's the case, then I think relocation is imperative.
Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Sep 17 2005, 12:13 AM
^This got me thinking. I have heard that a lot of the evacuees don't want to go back. Maybe there will be so few displaced people returning that part of the city can be returned to marsh land, and there will still be enough land to provide affordable housing.
Originally Posted by ralper,Sep 17 2005, 12:23 AM
An incredible opportunity only if you can keep the politics, special interests and connected people and companies out of it.
Most likely what is going to happen is what is happening right now in New York City at the site of the World Trade Center. It's four years and still no one can agree on the purpose and design of the replacement towers.
That said, the idea of rebuilding an entire city is mind boggling.
Most likely what is going to happen is what is happening right now in New York City at the site of the World Trade Center. It's four years and still no one can agree on the purpose and design of the replacement towers.
That said, the idea of rebuilding an entire city is mind boggling.
Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Sep 17 2005, 12:18 AM
^ Dean raises the fascinating part of this. What if you could build a city, almost from scratch? Here you have one heck of a franchise. New Orleans! Great history and culture. Plenty of modern day social problems. Heavily damaged, but not gone. National support to rebuild it at the public's expense. You get to rebuild it and keep the "flavor." An incredible opportunity!
However, my optimism took a big dip last night when I learned that Halliburton has been awarded a no-bid contract for the reconstruction, and Bush has chosen Karl Rove as the "architect" of this project. I can only shake my head in total disbelief at the rampant cronyism engaged in by this administration.
Proportionately, the poor will come with more than most compared to income or assets in aid from the government. Unfortunately they won't come out with an improvement to their life. Rather, the money will be eaten up and their housing etc will be more costly.
Most people have some insurance, but that won't cover their expenses either and all the additional costs of displacement.
I suspect most of the poor in NO will relocate to areas they can afford to live in. We saw that here after Andrew. I have sympathy for Houston and their social services system.
I still think the fed should roll back the cost of money. That would help lots of folks who are hurt recover and provide cheaper funds for building const etc. And it would help everyone across the board, spur growth provide jobs and extend peoples buying power.
My other solution is to call Las Vegas and let the Casinos rebuild it.
Either way, NO will never be the same.
fltsfshr
Most people have some insurance, but that won't cover their expenses either and all the additional costs of displacement.
I suspect most of the poor in NO will relocate to areas they can afford to live in. We saw that here after Andrew. I have sympathy for Houston and their social services system.
I still think the fed should roll back the cost of money. That would help lots of folks who are hurt recover and provide cheaper funds for building const etc. And it would help everyone across the board, spur growth provide jobs and extend peoples buying power.
My other solution is to call Las Vegas and let the Casinos rebuild it.
Either way, NO will never be the same.
fltsfshr
Wait until they get encounter the new bankruptcy standards. From what I'm hearing in the media, there's a lot less forgiveness in the system than before and more emphasis in at least partial repayments.
I'm not making value judgements about the bankruptcy system, but I suspect many of the lower-middle class will get hit harder than they would have a year ago.
Also, from what I've been hearing, NO has a very low rate of homeownership. Sounds like much of the federal aid will end up in the pockets of the landlords.
I'm not making value judgements about the bankruptcy system, but I suspect many of the lower-middle class will get hit harder than they would have a year ago.
Also, from what I've been hearing, NO has a very low rate of homeownership. Sounds like much of the federal aid will end up in the pockets of the landlords.
Landlords live there too. Usually what happens after an initial emergency dispensation, is the government will guarantee low interest loans to people affected including businesses and landlords.
If you have assets, in the end, you pay those loans back. They're still loans with interest.
fltsfshr
If you have assets, in the end, you pay those loans back. They're still loans with interest.
fltsfshr
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
S2000Patrick
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
109
Oct 24, 2007 09:11 PM








Not only will the poor be displaced, but they won't get any of the money.

