S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

QE 2

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 07:28 PM
  #1  
Legal Bill's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default QE 2

No, it isn't a cruise ship. It is the second round of quantitative easement. What is QE? Well, first the federal reserve just creates an account and fills it with money that wasn't there a minute ago. Then they use this newly created money to "ease" the supply of money by buying bonds from banks. the banks then have money to use for lending.

From what I have read about this, it is risky at best and could lead to the further erosion of the economy. At the very least, it piles more debt onto our economy.

I've been trying to read up on this. I do not claim to be an expert, and from what I have learned, our leaders do not understand it either. Here is some reference material:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_easing

http://www.businessinsider.com/qe-2-may-be...-options-2010-8

http://www.businessinsider.com/quantitativ...cularly-2010-10

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jodi-beggs/w...i_b_774941.html

Note well that some of these articles are contradictory, or leave out information that others include.

Some say this is needed to get the economy moving because the Fed cannot lower the interest rate any further. QE will push money into the system and make it easier to borrow and spend. Others warn that this will lead to inflation and may not work at all because there is simply no demand for cheap money right now.

If any of you understand this better than me, feel free to give it a shot. I'm trying to figure out what this means for the economy and my retirement account.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 07:24 AM
  #2  
Legal Bill's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

I guess it is not a house-hold issue fo rthe rest of you, either.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 11:23 AM
  #3  
PanteraKitty's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,056
Likes: 1
From: Stockbridge, Georgia
Default


I don't understand it but I am beginning to think our broker is right about 2029 basic living expenses being around $25,000/month.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 02:09 PM
  #4  
raymo19's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,471
Likes: 0
From: Flintstone GA
Default

All I can make out of it is the Fed is going to create new money from nothing by buying bonds so that the banks may create more new money from nothing by making loans.

I don't see any scenario in which that wouldn't be inflationary. But a little inflation might be a good thing - at least bonds, CDs and savings might see a bump in interest rates.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 05:27 PM
  #5  
Matt_in_VA's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,928
Likes: 769
From: Clifton, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Oct 28 2010, 11:24 AM
I guess it is not a house-hold issue fo rthe rest of you, either.
As a listener of National Public Radio (NPR) during my morning and afternoon drive times I knew and understood what you meant by this.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 05:35 PM
  #6  
RedY2KS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,296
Likes: 2
From: Delaware, OH
Default

The Realtors, mortgage originators, and house builders got fat at our expense, and we just need to let the crap work through the system. A little hard living would build character.

I know that you don't subscribe to the "moral hazard" side of the arguement but I do. I don't want to live in a society where gamblers don't suffer the consequences of their losses.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 11:22 AM
  #7  
2Red2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: New Freedom, PA
Default

Originally Posted by raymo19,Oct 28 2010, 05:09 PM
All I can make out of it is the Fed is going to create new money from nothing by buying bonds so that the banks may create more new money from nothing by making loans.

I don't see any scenario in which that wouldn't be inflationary. But a little inflation might be a good thing - at least bonds, CDs and savings might see a bump in interest rates.
Paul Krugman chimes in, sort of - often can't tell whether he is in favor or not.

Link to Krugman

The risk is that A little inflation could be like being a little pregnant. Once that dragon is out of the cave, it can be damn hard to stuff it back.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 29, 2010 | 12:06 PM
  #8  
raymo19's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,471
Likes: 0
From: Flintstone GA
Default

I think we'd be seeing it already if more people were employed and those who are employed were spending money.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 12:25 PM
  #9  
zzziippyyy's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 78,840
Likes: 7
From: On yo puter screen
Default

I don't believe anything I read in regards to the market anymore and i am up 13% YTD so
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010 | 12:59 PM
  #10  
Legal Bill's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

This really isn't about the market, Dave. This is about the fed flooding the banks with money.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wilch
Australia & New Zealand S2000 Owners
5
Dec 29, 2006 02:03 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 AM.