Signatures
I don't know, sometimes I get a real good chuckle from a sig. Some are funny, and some are clever. I agree that oftentimes they're in poor taste and too long, but it's worth seeing those for the few really clever ones I see.
And also with fltsfshr:
I can read around the crap, non issue for me. But I really do like those penguins.
edit: apparently a word that rhymes with "corn" is a no no...what's next?
Originally Posted by raymo19,Jun 30 2006, 09:01 PM
Would that be you or the car? Or is that TMI material? 

I did enjoy my drive tonight. I'm off Monday, Rick has to work. The S is MINE, MINE, MINE for the whole day.
One really easy thing people can do to make the sigs less "annoying" (IMO, anyways) is to list things horizontally, rather than vertically. For instance, both ralper and cordy have lists (meets and cars) in their sigs that take up one line per item. Rather than list them vertically, why not list horizontally, so that large ammounts of screen real estate are not consumed with the sig? There's a big difference, IMO, between:
2000 S2000, Silverstone
2003 E320
2005 LR3
1999 ML430
1990 Mazda Miata (soon to be track car)
1990 Ducati 851/888 Superbike
And
2000 S2000, Silverstone
2000 S2000, Silverstone
2003 E320
2005 LR3
1999 ML430
1990 Mazda Miata (soon to be track car)
1990 Ducati 851/888 Superbike
And
2000 S2000, Silverstone
Originally Posted by ralper,Jun 30 2006, 06:32 PM
I don't know, sometimes I get a real good chuckle from a sig. Some are funny, and some are clever. I agree that oftentimes they're in poor taste and too long, but it's worth seeing those for the few really clever ones I see.
Chris,
As a matter of fact if you look closely at my sig you'll see the meets are listed both horizontally and vertically. The titles of the meets are verticle, but the years of participation are horizontal. I tried it your way and found the sig to be way too hard to read.
I'm not sure that this is the problem anyway. I think that Doc was more talking about the huge graphics and distasteful photos.
I do agree with you, however, I too would ban all moving pictures and graphics. I find them to be very distracting. I don't even like the animated badges.
As a matter of fact if you look closely at my sig you'll see the meets are listed both horizontally and vertically. The titles of the meets are verticle, but the years of participation are horizontal. I tried it your way and found the sig to be way too hard to read.
I'm not sure that this is the problem anyway. I think that Doc was more talking about the huge graphics and distasteful photos.
I do agree with you, however, I too would ban all moving pictures and graphics. I find them to be very distracting. I don't even like the animated badges.
Originally Posted by mikegarrison,Jun 30 2006, 09:52 PM
Of which you have two?
I do belong to both clubs, and I am proud to display their banners, even though I don't like the banner.









