S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

What do you think of Harriet Miers

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-05-2005, 04:53 PM
  #21  

Thread Starter
 
ralper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 32,574
Received 1,417 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Default

What I don't like most of all is that this appointment reeks of cronyism. More rewards to loyal friends. I don't think thats the credentials a Supreme Court Justice should be appointed on.
Old 10-05-2005, 05:19 PM
  #22  

 
Matt_in_VA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Clifton, VA
Posts: 12,315
Received 470 Likes on 279 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Oct 5 2005, 08:53 PM
What I don't like most of all is that this appointment reeks of cronyism. More rewards to loyal friends. I don't think thats the credentials a Supreme Court Justice should be appointed on.
But that is why I have such distane for Politicians. The previous Adminiistration had there share of appointments as well.
Old 10-05-2005, 05:25 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
mikegarrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Covington WA, USA
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by matt_inva,Oct 5 2005, 06:19 PM
But that is why I have such distane for Politicians. The previous Adminiistration had there share of appointments as well.
Anyone is going to naturally trust his friends more than strangers, and also to reward them if he has the opportunity to do so. The unnerving thing about Bush the younger is his seeming tendency to make friendship and personal loyalty the ONLY factor that is important in his appointments, rather than just one factor out of many.
Old 10-05-2005, 05:39 PM
  #24  

Thread Starter
 
ralper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 32,574
Received 1,417 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikegarrison,Oct 5 2005, 09:25 PM
Anyone is going to naturally trust his friends more than strangers, and also to reward them if he has the opportunity to do so. The unnerving thing about Bush the younger is his seeming tendency to make friendship and personal loyalty the ONLY factor that is important in his appointments, rather than just one factor out of many.


In past administrations the appointees were generally qualified for the position. In this administration qualifications seem to have very little to do with the appointment.

It is possible that Harriet Meirs is qualified yet knowing what we know about most of Bush's appointments, this one reeks of cronyism.
Old 10-05-2005, 05:44 PM
  #25  

 
Matt_in_VA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Clifton, VA
Posts: 12,315
Received 470 Likes on 279 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Oct 5 2005, 09:39 PM


In past administrations the appointees were generally qualified for the position. In this administration qualifications seem to have very little to do with the appointment.

It is possible that Harriet Meirs is qualified yet knowing what we know about most of Bush's appointments, this one reeks of cronyism.
So are you suggesting that like the last Chief Justice that had NO prior experience as a Judge that her nomination is any different?
Old 10-05-2005, 05:49 PM
  #26  

Thread Starter
 
ralper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 32,574
Received 1,417 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by matt_inva,Oct 5 2005, 09:44 PM
So are you suggesting that like the last Chief Justice that had NO prior experience as a Judge that her nomination is any different?
No, I'm not saying that at all. I'm not even saying that Harriet Miers is not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice. She may or may not be. Unfortunately nobody knows that much about her. All I'm saying is that based on the way that Bush has made his appointments in the past, this whole thing smells bad.
Old 10-05-2005, 05:50 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
mikegarrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Covington WA, USA
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by matt_inva,Oct 5 2005, 06:44 PM
So are you suggesting that like the last Chief Justice that had NO prior experience as a Judge that her nomination is any different?
To tell the truth, I was never super-impressed with Reinquist....
Old 10-05-2005, 05:51 PM
  #28  

Thread Starter
 
ralper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 32,574
Received 1,417 Likes on 1,110 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikegarrison,Oct 5 2005, 09:50 PM
To tell the truth, I was never super-impressed with Reinquist....
I wasn't either, but that's besides the point.
Old 10-05-2005, 06:22 PM
  #29  

 
paS2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Philly (Narberth)
Posts: 18,871
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Lake George attendees:

It will soon be time to bury the political hatchets for the weekend
Old 10-05-2005, 07:42 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
cordycord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To tell the truth, I was never super-impressed with Reinquist....
I wasn't either, but that's besides the point.
Ginsberg said he was the best boss she ever had. What's your beef(s)?


Quick Reply: What do you think of Harriet Miers



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:32 PM.