Post whore thread
Originally Posted by tnrsxs,Sep 28 2007, 12:59 AM

-Matt
Originally Posted by Fuelrush,Sep 28 2007, 02:56 AM
UPS knocked on my door today. Got a NEW Xbox 360 sent to me. I must say that a billion (not joking) dollars Microsoft spent is working.
-Matt
Originally Posted by mattfeet,Sep 28 2007, 11:48 AM
Say it ain't so! Your car is gorgeous man! And don't hesitate to come out to the meets once you get your new car. Once a member, always a member. 
-Matt

-Matt
His winning bid yesterday....
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/LOTUS-ELISE...1QQcmdZViewItem
Random question: in the book The Cat in the Hat, do you think of the Fish and Cat as gender neutral, masculine, or feminine and why. I'm writing a paper for my Psychology of Gender Roles class on children's books and I am looking for people to collaborate or disagree with my own impressions before I put them into a paper. One person's opinion is just one person's opinion, and in my opinion not worthy of mention in a paper. However, if more than one person thinks it, there's got to be a reason. This is what I'm trying to find out.
Pardon my random, perhaps stupid question. Blame it on a liberal arts education, a women's college, a scientific mind, or all of the above. Thanks for your input. Any other gender comments welcome. I just might use them, too.
Pardon my random, perhaps stupid question. Blame it on a liberal arts education, a women's college, a scientific mind, or all of the above. Thanks for your input. Any other gender comments welcome. I just might use them, too.
I basically see them as gender neutral but if push came to shove the cat would have to be masculine. He doesn't act effeminate (as best as I remember - been a while) and the stove pipe hat is not something a female would wear. The fish is even more neutral but with some attributes usually aligned (more so) with femininity - the "voice" of caution/reason/prudence, the hand wringing, etc.
Interesting. Thanks for your reply. I think I buy into, or at least think that other people buy into the stereotype that the voice of reason, prudence, etc. would be male and the emotional, illogical voice would be female. I know that this is not the case from personal experience; the women I know are much more practical than the men I know, but I think that stereotype is out there. Maybe I'm wrong?
It's been my experience that the average male is less cautious in most situations compared to his counterpart. Especially if he's looking for a good time or trying to impress someone.
As far as females being more practical . . . . .
I can think of many instances where that has not been the case. So much so that I doubt gender is a real factor.
It's certainly not across the board.
Sorry.
And I sense you were just beginning to like me too.
As far as females being more practical . . . . .

I can think of many instances where that has not been the case. So much so that I doubt gender is a real factor.
It's certainly not across the board.
Sorry.
And I sense you were just beginning to like me too.





Here we go again...
Welcome to the boards from Ky