UK & Ireland S2000 Community Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it in the UK and Ireland. Including FAQs, and technical questions.

95 octane

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 05:52 AM
  #11  
phil121081's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 1
Default

i do genuinly think you get better economy from super, so could be a false economy. I've not put 95 in my S, but experimented a few times with my old ITR and the super did give better economy, although the VTEC 'kick' was more noticeable with 95.

That said, i put some diesel v-power in the audi and got about 100 miles less from that tank, so chuck any old stuff in the oil burner.

(and yes the audi is a diesel).
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 05:53 AM
  #12  
AquilaEagle's Avatar
Administrator
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 95,183
Likes: 69
From: Heath & Reach, Beds, UK
Default

It will run perfectly well unless it is highly modified (the engine, not stickers, stripes or spoilers).
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 06:05 AM
  #13  
Chablonski's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: North Devon
Default

Thanks Guys I will give it a go,
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 07:48 AM
  #14  
Si2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,423
Likes: 0
From: Reading, UK
Default

I get better milage on Vpower so it pays for itself.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 08:09 AM
  #15  
m1bjr's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,445
Likes: 7
From: Plymouth
Default

Originally Posted by Si2k,Jan 4 2011, 05:48 PM
I get better milage on Vpower so it pays for itself.


It was noticable on the S2000, moreso if you have a blower and a decent ECU.

I found quickly I returned about 10% better economy on V-Power.
Its less than 10% dearer so its actually a better buy.

Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 08:11 AM
  #16  
GavB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,663
Likes: 0
From: Chester
Default

JDM cars appear to be the exception, quite a few report real knock as the ecu is unable to fully compensate.

My 56 plate runs fine on 95.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 08:38 AM
  #17  
Ginge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: Rochester - North Kent
Default

Mmmm.

I have a JDM and I am having the head skimmed so I'm pretty sure when it gets going I am really going to have to stick with high octane stuff.

I know one this though.

When I was in the Skoda it ran back to back dyno pulls with 14hp more on V power than 95 RON, no changes, same day, same temperature etc.
It also did 35 more miles per tank on quality fuel.

Around 11% more.


These high octane fuels need specific engine work or a turbo for you to really benefit.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 08:39 AM
  #18  
loftust's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,234
Likes: 3
From: Fareham, Hants
Default

Originally Posted by GavB,Jan 4 2011, 06:11 PM
JDM cars appear to be the exception
Due to the thinner head gasket, therefore higher compression ratio...therefore more BHP
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 09:29 AM
  #19  
Wobbly's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,520
Likes: 0
From: Stamford
Default

I have always used BP Ultimate because that's the only high octane fuel I can buy in the area. Filled to the brim with the stuff, I managed 330 miles on a trip down to Cornwall for New Years Eve. For the return journey I used normal 95 octane and only managed 300 miles which meant I had to re-fuel to get home. Maths not being a strong point of mine, I think that it's roughly equal ie more expensive fuel = more mpg vs slightly cheaper fuel = slightly less mpg
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2011 | 10:01 AM
  #20  
unclefester's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 13,330
Likes: 180
Default

Normal cold weather driving .... no need for 97
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 AM.