Clio v S2000
09-03-2004, 07:55 AM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stuck in traffic
Posts: 9,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From my limited experience of playing with cars like that (hardly anyone ever tries it on with me) they can put up a fight until you throw some corners in, at which point they very quickly become a dot in the mirror.
09-03-2004, 08:02 AM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Leafy surrey
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikey k,Sep 3 2004, 03:36 PM
Renault 
expect he was to ashamed to admit he had to go back and collect the bits that fell off 
expect he was to ashamed to admit he had to go back and collect the bits that fell off 
Like all Renaults, power to weight ratios always improve with driving especially under hard conditions.
09-03-2004, 08:04 AM
#14
Registered User
This bit cracked me up a bit
"yeah was nice, he was a flash git tho with the roof down!"
Well it is a fekin converible, got to question the intelligence of some of these Clio drivers
"yeah was nice, he was a flash git tho with the roof down!"
Well it is a fekin converible, got to question the intelligence of some of these Clio drivers
09-03-2004, 08:04 AM
#15
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: City Of London / Knebworth
Posts: 39,551
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
10 Posts
Clio Williams is >100bhp down on an S2K.
Couldn't have been trying.
(I had one of the first Clio 16v cars in the country ...... the build quality was the worst I have ever come across (3 clutch cables, rear window exploded, fuel pipe broke, wheels more corroded than the S) Luckily it was a company car)
Couldn't have been trying.
(I had one of the first Clio 16v cars in the country ...... the build quality was the worst I have ever come across (3 clutch cables, rear window exploded, fuel pipe broke, wheels more corroded than the S) Luckily it was a company car)
09-03-2004, 08:10 AM
#18
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by StevenM,Sep 3 2004, 05:04 PM
Clio Williams is >100bhp down on an S2K.
Couldn't have been trying.
(I had one of the first Clio 16v cars in the country ...... the build quality was the worst I have ever come across (3 clutch cables, rear window exploded, fuel pipe broke, wheels more corroded than the S) Luckily it was a company car)
Couldn't have been trying.
(I had one of the first Clio 16v cars in the country ...... the build quality was the worst I have ever come across (3 clutch cables, rear window exploded, fuel pipe broke, wheels more corroded than the S) Luckily it was a company car)
Also found this one.. one to look out for if it ever makes it on the road
09-03-2004, 08:14 AM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 4,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
204bhp per tonne will be faster than an s which would be 17bhp per tonne down.
All about power to WEIGHT which so many people forget. How I get by with 'only' 190bhp I'll never know
All about power to WEIGHT which so many people forget. How I get by with 'only' 190bhp I'll never know
