Fast and Furious S2k
09-28-2001, 09:38 AM
#21
The profanities in this thread are quite offensive.
I**5 is not called for, except by snivelling morons trying to treat genuinely self-employed people as employees without the employee rights.
I'm an accountant with some clients suffering this. Oh, it makes me mad...mad....maaaddd....MAAD. (No Mongor - never kill a Revnue Officer!)
To people who will use such language I suggest they visit:
www.accountax-ltd.com
If such profanities re-appear, I will ****ing complain.
I**5 is not called for, except by snivelling morons trying to treat genuinely self-employed people as employees without the employee rights.
I'm an accountant with some clients suffering this. Oh, it makes me mad...mad....maaaddd....MAAD. (No Mongor - never kill a Revnue Officer!)
To people who will use such language I suggest they visit:
www.accountax-ltd.com
If such profanities re-appear, I will ****ing complain.
09-28-2001, 10:31 AM
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Watford
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Nick Graves
[B]The profanities in this thread are quite offensive.
[B]The profanities in this thread are quite offensive.
.... sir...
09-28-2001, 11:00 AM
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: stafford
Posts: 10,655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by awinskill
I take it you're refering to the T*x I*******r phrase? I promise I'll not repeat it .... sir...
I take it you're refering to the T*x I*******r phrase? I promise I'll not repeat it
.... sir...
Tax Inspector.....there, I said it, not too bad
09-29-2001, 03:52 AM
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Warrington
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Nick Graves
Sorry - It's the I**5 phrase.
It's like the phrase "No.4 Cylinder failure" to S2000 enthusiasts
Sorry - It's the I**5 phrase.
It's like the phrase "No.4 Cylinder failure" to S2000 enthusiasts
And it benefits the revenue favourite clients EDS by removing some competition.
Nice one Tony!!!
10-01-2001, 03:21 PM
#26
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Inside your head
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just got back from seeing it.
It was a like the film 'point break', but with cars instead of surfboards..... worth seeing though.
It was a like the film 'point break', but with cars instead of surfboards..... worth seeing though.
Originally posted by NEED4SPEED
Has anyone seen the movie yet! There's no plot - well not a good one anyway! But There's a black S2k hich is modded with nitrous and looks absolutely awesome!
The movie's worth watching just for that seen alone!
Has anyone seen the movie yet! There's no plot - well not a good one anyway! But There's a black S2k hich is modded with nitrous and looks absolutely awesome!
The movie's worth watching just for that seen alone!
10-01-2001, 09:21 PM
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Watford
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE]Originally posted by UKjasonm
[B]
For the benfit of those who dont know what the I**3 phrase refers to, its a new tax law brought in by Poo Labour to punish genuinely self employed people by subjecting them to the same tax laws as an employed person but not permitting them the same benfits ie. Holiday, Sick Pay, Pension, etc
And it benefits the revenue favourite clients EDS by removing some competition.
[B]
For the benfit of those who dont know what the I**3 phrase refers to, its a new tax law brought in by Poo Labour to punish genuinely self employed people by subjecting them to the same tax laws as an employed person but not permitting them the same benfits ie. Holiday, Sick Pay, Pension, etc
And it benefits the revenue favourite clients EDS by removing some competition.
10-01-2001, 10:35 PM
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: stafford
Posts: 10,655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by awinskill
One of the interesting things I had was that I had a client who also provided services. Client engaged my company to meet some short term demand for their services they couldn't satisfy. I ended up working for my clients client (which in IR35 [bugger swore again...] terms means that my clients client is actually my client WTF?? ). The fact that my client & my company have now ended up working closely with my clients client is now viewed as being suspicious by the revenue ?!?! They're wont take into account the fact that I have had multiple concurrent contracts in the same period, or that I have actually bidded against my client......
One of the interesting things I had was that I had a client who also provided services. Client engaged my company to meet some short term demand for their services they couldn't satisfy. I ended up working for my clients client (which in IR35 [bugger swore again...] terms means that my clients client is actually my client WTF?? ). The fact that my client & my company have now ended up working closely with my clients client is now viewed as being suspicious by the revenue ?!?! They're wont take into account the fact that I have had multiple concurrent contracts in the same period, or that I have actually bidded against my client......
10-01-2001, 10:51 PM
#30
Originally posted by awinskill
Trust me my head hurts too
When my accountant and lawyer explained it to me I got
Labour, the friends of big business, fcuk the little guy....
Trust me my head hurts too
When my accountant and lawyer explained it to me I got
Labour, the friends of big business, fcuk the little guy....
And that was before you know what.
-Brian.