S2000Forever

Would be risky to buy a S2k year 2000 considering that this is the second year model. Very clean condition 108000 km

NDAZONE

No.

WinFreak

All depends on how it's been treated by it's owner(s) but the exact same would be for a 2009 one. Only difference is that its had 9 more years of potential battering

nomadicS2k

Same for any 17 year old car! Expect some bills!

calisfar

Pay particular attention to the rear arches. Take a look at the recent rear arches thread.

har-vey

From my experience in working for automotive companies, if you intend to keep the car for any period of time, don't buy a car within the first 6 months to a year from start of production. There is always going to be a number of issues when a new car is released but once your past the 1st year you should be fine.

There is always going to be issues when buying an older car but this forum is full of useful information so you'll be in good hands. These cars have been around a while now and we all know the issues its had so its quite easy to look out for a good car.

Make sure the rust hasn't set in on the rear arches and ideally check the bushes haven't seized.

CynicG

To be fair, the OP hasn't given a reason for purchase and may be looking for a Project car, a track car or whatever.

If the expectation is a fault and maintenance free car, any S2000 is probably a little gamble just due to the age. If he/she wants a car they can abuse and provide constant smiles, the bills can be worth it.

E4RTH WORM JIM

Fair point... except it's the opposite round with the S2000

har-vey

Well actually it works both ways. I also wouldnt want one from the final run of cars as by that point the company is trying to save money on the production so cut costs of componants which is evident on the s2000. For example the lower quality leather used on the seats.

Bodyboarder1981

.... so what everyone is saying is that 2004-2006 are the glory years

hahaha