Is this too cheap?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Hmm, thats what I thought.....coupled with all the spelling mistakes and the engine going to 9200 RPM all sounds a bit dodgy.
I did expect you to say the first was too cheap too though, certainly less than others I've seen advertised.....
I did expect you to say the first was too cheap too though, certainly less than others I've seen advertised.....
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,661
Likes: 0
From: Perth, Australia
Originally Posted by apkent,Sep 20 2007, 02:09 PM
Hmm, thats what I thought.....coupled with all the spelling mistakes and the engine going to 9200 RPM all sounds a bit dodgy.
it accelerates as if turbocharged!
Note, there is one slight little problem this car was involved in an accident around a year ago
Trending Topics
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: Sarf London
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire!
Originally Posted by apkent,Sep 20 2007, 01:09 PM
Hmm, thats what I thought.....coupled with all the spelling mistakes and the engine going to 9200 RPM all sounds a bit dodgy.
I did expect you to say the first was too cheap too though, certainly less than others I've seen advertised.....
I did expect you to say the first was too cheap too though, certainly less than others I've seen advertised.....
I'd also like to see a car where the engine is mounted in front, rather than behind the front wheels!
'With the engine mounted behind the front wheels and rear wheel drive it gives the car perfect 50:50 ratio, the car handels like a dream even at high speed!'
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 2
From: St. Asaph, N. Wales
Originally Posted by Steb,Sep 20 2007, 07:25 AM
I'd also like to see a car where the engine is mounted in front, rather than behind the front wheels!