unclefester

Only one known engine failure ...... Hmmmmmm that's not entirely true now is it

GreenmanS2000

Where are all these comments you're reading? I can't see them in the article....

blue monster

Didn't the S2000 score really high in the Top Gear / JD Power surveys at one point in time?

BenRNBP

Honest John says it so it must be true ... that, or the article was written before 2008

Nick Graves

It's a shitty little Gov't Mule propaganda rag. WGAF?

RyanT

firstly that 3 series is a colour eye sore.

s2000 prices from 4000 maybe for a high mile pre facelift. not like the one pictured

phil121081

the S in picture look s like it might have run into some wildlife... driver side front bumper / wing alignment is all wrong.. speaking from experience.

Nezquick

Out of that "Top 10" there's only one i'd have and that's the S.

The only other sensible cheap convertibles are an MX5 or an MR2 IMHO.

I don't understand why that 6 series is on the list either - bet one of those would be a nightmare to own out of warranty. There's a reason it's cheap to buy!!

j8mie

7k gets you a 2004 645. That's not a lot of cash for a lot of car. Like you said I bets the bills can get quite hefty on a car like that.

On a side point is that Magnum PI driving the Jag XK8

lower

Heresy to say this on this forum, but i agree that the S2000 is not as reliable as other Hondas.

For example, i had to have a new engine in both my s2000s. Both replaced under Honda warranty.

That's a 100% failure rate.

The first one also had a new clutch under warranty. The second one had 2 new sets of wheels under warranty and a hub nut came off.