UK & Ireland S2000 Community Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it in the UK and Ireland. Including FAQs, and technical questions.

Torque Vs BHP

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 09:12 AM
  #1  
s2konroids's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 20,788
Likes: 8
From: location, location
Default Torque Vs BHP

DOnt understand how the S performance is the same as other cars with high Torque values higher than the S when wighter roughly the same, eg subarus wrx etc etc.

I though if a car had more torque and about the same weight it would be car x up a hill or in a straight line?

I know BHP is porportional to torque, and it the force upon the wheels make on the ground.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 09:18 AM
  #2  
Bibbs's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,661
Likes: 0
From: Perth, Australia
Default

It's due to gearing.

Look at a bike engine, massive BHP per liter, but no torque. They get over this with high revs.

(Torque x Engine speed) / 5,252 = Horsepower

Originally Posted by a mate
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car.
Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall.
Torque is how far you take the wall with you.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 09:20 AM
  #3  
jml's Avatar
jml
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 35
From: Bruges
Default

http://www.epi-eng.com/BAS-PwrTrq.htm
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #4  
wingnutLP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
From: Camden, London
Default

Originally Posted by jml,Nov 28 2006, 10:20 AM
nice thanks

I have never really understood the relationship before!
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 10:26 AM
  #5  
AquilaEagle's Avatar
Administrator
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 95,183
Likes: 69
From: Heath & Reach, Beds, UK
Default

Nice link Learn something every day here
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #6  
YiorgoS2k's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: Limassol
Default

Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car.
Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall.
Torque is how far you take the wall with you.
Wise words
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #7  
NNervous_R's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: Surrey twilight zone
Default

Or in a picture:



That's me crossed of the Christmas party list then
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Nov 28, 2006 | 02:36 PM
  #8  
mattlad's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
From: Worcestershire
Default

Originally Posted by Bibbs,Nov 28 2006, 10:18 AM
It's due to gearing.

Look at a bike engine, massive BHP per liter, but no torque. They get over this with high revs.

(Torque x Engine speed) / 5,252 = Horsepower

Originally Posted by a mate
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car.
Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall.
Torque is how far you take the wall with you.
I've never used this formula, the one we always used to use was:-

2 X Pi x n x T = p where n = engine speed & T = torque
33000.00

This does work.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 03:01 PM
  #9  
Saxo Boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,479
Likes: 0
From: Edinburgh
Default

The key consideration that everyone forgets is that when we talk cars we talk engine figures. The S2000 has 240bhp and 161lbft of torque at its engine. A classic shape impreza has an engine output of 220bhp and 214lbft of torque and both cars weight about the same. Run these side by side from 40mph (to overcome traction advantage) and the S2000 will pull away.

The reason for this is that looking at the engine output in isolation is flawed because all the force it produces has a system of gearing to go through before its applied via the rubber to the road. The S2000's gearing is designed to specifically take advantage of the high reving f20c engine. The impreza also has to run it's engine power through more power sapping differentials before it gets to the road.

The key place to measure the force that an engine produces is at the wheels and preferably across the useable power range. On that note I'd bet my gran that the S2000 can achieve a greater overall wheel torque figure than the standard classic impreza despite the powerplant trailing by a significant margine. The ironic thing is that we take our cars to dyno's where wheel torque accross the useable power range of one of the higher gears is measured. The graph produced can tell us pretty much everything we'd ever want to know about the performance capabilities of our machine. However, we then extrapolate (i.e. guess) this information to generate an engine horsepower figure and that's what gets posted on the forums and touted around in the pub.

So in short a powerplant is just a component part of the overall machine and to gauge how that machine will perform you can't look at any component in isolation - crank torque, rpm, gearing, drivetrain, weight, drag co, etc all count towards final performance.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 12:55 AM
  #10  
Bibbs's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,661
Likes: 0
From: Perth, Australia
Default

[QUOTE=mattlad,Nov 28 2006, 11:36 PM] I've never used this formula, the one we always used to use was:-

2 X Pi x n x T
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:40 AM.