correct me if im wrong but mustangs dyno are the worst for accurate reading
dynojet / dynapack are more accurate

but at the end of the day

dyno numbers are for show, and track times are for the dough

haha wish i got force induction to say something like that !!

 

i have no idea in the terms on accuracy...

but in the spring i could easily go dyno somewhere else if i am looking for numbers,

and ray i totally agree with you... it would be nice if there was a standardization of dyno calibrations...



at the end of the day all i know is i want more power(once my car is running again) lol

 

man i wanna track my car...we should all auto-x together...im guessin it'll b ur first too right jordan/stephaaaaaaaaaaaaaan?

 

yea,

it would be my first time.... i know we have some members that do it all the time... i want to go out and watch and learn first haha


*ray, add coca1ne_cowgurl


its my new psn, don't expect me to carry the team though lol.... this one is strictly for fun lol

 

i haven't played in like 2weeks...doubt im gonna start again. It was very frustrating getting the hang of the analog again

 

let's go let's go let's go

and ya..screw the numbers. You can have 1000hp but it doesn't mean anything if you can't drive.....

 

I am actually thinking of keeping it NA if i want to seriously track the car.

 

see, i dont have that problem since i never play on the computer, my problem is the campers...

its getting way to out of hand

 

Guys I'm in too. My car is hitting the track this year, and I'm a track virgin.

 

actually load bearing dynos are the most accurate to having REAL readings... Dynojets, etc don't apply load to the wheels. Puttin load on the wheels actually acts as if the wheels were on the ground actually rolling. RG's dyno is just poorly calibrated I think. I don't care really that its low though.. I can say i only have 240 whp and then beat something that is claiming 300whp.