Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

8.5 +45 with a 255 Up Front

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 3, 2014 | 02:59 PM
  #1  
maranelloboy05's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 149
From: Austin, TX
Default 8.5 +45 with a 255 Up Front

Would I be able to fit a 17x8.5 +45 up front with a 255 without rubbing, lowered about an 1"-1.5"? This is not can I make it fit by running stupid camber and driving really slow, this is will it fit with a roll and -2 camber while I push the car hard on back roads.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2014 | 03:09 PM
  #2  
.eric.'s Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 6
From: Ellicott City MD
Default

Probably not. 225/40 up front and 255/40 in the rear will likely work without rubbing. Yeah, I know. Not what you wanted to hear...
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2014 | 03:12 PM
  #3  
joey77051's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Default

i have 17x8.5 +40 with 255 in the front with a rolled fender and it fits; however, my car is on stock height.....
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2014 | 03:15 PM
  #4  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

No, you would need to pull the fender a good 10-15mm. Which after you roll isn't that big of a deal up front, but be prepared. The tire will be bulging a bit on that narrow of a rim, and for front fitment that is a problem. If you are not willing to pull the fenders or exceed -2 camber then a 245 will have to do, and your pushing it at that. If you simply added width to the rim but kept the outer space the same you wouldn't have an issue, simply because the tire profile would be slightly stretched and more optimum for fitment, it would also handle better. 9 +52 OR 9.5 +58 for example.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2014 | 03:17 PM
  #5  
Manga_Spawn's Avatar
Site Moderator
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 13,625
Likes: 372
From: Seattle WA
Default

I assume you are trying to not roll your fenders in which case no you cannot fit that wheel and tire without a roll and camber at least. I also agree that a 245 would be the better choice.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2014 | 03:17 PM
  #6  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by joey77051
i have 17x8.5 +40 with 255 in the front with a rolled fender and it fits; however, my car is on stock height.....
Guarantee it would rub terribly if you actually compressed the suspension far enough. Obviously when your lowered, your taking up all of that space for the wheel to tuck and or travel before it hits the fender, so fitment as to be right.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2014 | 03:36 PM
  #7  
maranelloboy05's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 149
From: Austin, TX
Default

I'm rolled now, but not pulled, don't want to pull.

Would it be stupid to run staggered tires on a square wheel setup?

Only set of Spoon CR93s in the country is 8.5 +45 square, ideally I'd do 8.5+53 but no one has them and they aren't coming any time soon.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 3, 2014 | 03:37 PM
  #8  
joey77051's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
Originally Posted by joey77051' timestamp='1388794329' post='22949051
i have 17x8.5 +40 with 255 in the front with a rolled fender and it fits; however, my car is on stock height.....
Guarantee it would rub terribly if you actually compressed the suspension far enough. Obviously when your lowered, your taking up all of that space for the wheel to tuck and or travel before it hits the fender, so fitment as to be right.

Agreed. But on stock height it is a really easy fit with rolled fenders; I have drive hard on canyon road and been on terrible road condition and it does not rub or hit at all.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2014 | 11:50 PM
  #9  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by maranelloboy05
I'm rolled now, but not pulled, don't want to pull.

Would it be stupid to run staggered tires on a square wheel setup?

Only set of Spoon CR93s in the country is 8.5 +45 square, ideally I'd do 8.5+53 but no one has them and they aren't coming any time soon.
Not at all, I wouldn't hesitate to run a 235/40 or 245 on the front with your 255 rear on that size wheel.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2014 | 01:22 PM
  #10  
donding6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

I have 255 all around with only a roll, lowered on tein springs and stock camber. And I have no rubbing issues at all. I say go for it unless you're planing to drop the car.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:05 PM.