Kumho ECSTA MX v. OEM?
I posted this in the wheel/tire forum, but that area doesn't seem to get a lot of traffic...
I need a new set of rear tires (fronts still have plenty of wear left on them at 16,500 miles). I see on tirerack.com that I can get the Kumho ECSTA MX (which has excellent reviews and a higher wear rating that OEM, 220 v. 140) for $129 for the rear and $111 for the front, while the OEM are $178 for the rear. So, should I replace all four tires with the Kumho for $480 or just replace the rears with OEM for $356? Seems to me that for just $124, I might as well replace all four tires with the Kumhos and get a higher wear rating in the process if they are just as good as OEM. Any thougts would be appreciated. Thanks.
I need a new set of rear tires (fronts still have plenty of wear left on them at 16,500 miles). I see on tirerack.com that I can get the Kumho ECSTA MX (which has excellent reviews and a higher wear rating that OEM, 220 v. 140) for $129 for the rear and $111 for the front, while the OEM are $178 for the rear. So, should I replace all four tires with the Kumho for $480 or just replace the rears with OEM for $356? Seems to me that for just $124, I might as well replace all four tires with the Kumhos and get a higher wear rating in the process if they are just as good as OEM. Any thougts would be appreciated. Thanks.
First, tire ratings are meaningless between brands, as tire wear is measured differently between them.
Second, I did a nice detailed write up of the Kumho MX in the wheels & tires section FAQ for 04+, so you should check that out.
Third, be wary of using different brands of tires front and back - the grip thresholds can cause problems with traction and controlling the car, so just be warned.
Personally, if your fronts are good for another 16k mi, I'd just replace the rears with OEM, (but I do like my Kuhmo MX now that they are broken in).
Second, I did a nice detailed write up of the Kumho MX in the wheels & tires section FAQ for 04+, so you should check that out.
Third, be wary of using different brands of tires front and back - the grip thresholds can cause problems with traction and controlling the car, so just be warned.
Personally, if your fronts are good for another 16k mi, I'd just replace the rears with OEM, (but I do like my Kuhmo MX now that they are broken in).
^ Thanks. I'm not contemplating putting the Kumho on the rear and keeping the OEM on the front. Rather, I am trying to decide between replacing all four with the Kumho or replacing just the rear with the OEM (my front OEM appear to have a good amount of wear left on them). I read your review of the Kumhos. Do you like them better than OEM?
Originally Posted by bjohnston,Apr 2 2007, 02:17 PM
^ Thanks. I'm not contemplating putting the Kumho on the rear and keeping the OEM on the front. Rather, I am trying to decide between replacing all four with the Kumho or replacing just the rear with the OEM (my front OEM appear to have a good amount of wear left on them). I read your review of the Kumhos. Do you like them better than OEM?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







