Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Need help with alignment square setup 315s

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 05:21 PM
  #21  
arazs2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Glendale
Default

Reply
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 05:25 PM
  #22  
Mark355's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 7,956
Likes: 43
From: Troy, NY
Default

315s on a 9? wtf.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 07:01 PM
  #23  
RedCelica's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,342
Likes: 103
From: Raleigh
Default

Wow...seeing those tires on those wheels and all I can think about is Thanksgiving.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2012 | 02:06 AM
  #24  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Optimal alignment depends on many factors, but generally you won't want much toe at all (zero front, maybe 0.1-0.2degrees total rear?) as wider tires generate more lateral force per slip angle, and you shouldn't need as much camber as narrower tires (might try ~1.5 - 2 degrees all around? WAG...) Then again, way-too-wide tires spooned on to narrow (for 315 tires anyway!) wheels might suggest a bit more camber than that. I dunno...

Tires are definitely WIDE for 9" wheels! Nitto gives 10.5" - 12.5" as the rim width range for your tire size. Your wheels are 1.5" narrower than the minimum!
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2012 | 09:40 AM
  #25  
arazs2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Glendale
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan
Optimal alignment depends on many factors, but generally you won't want much toe at all (zero front, maybe 0.1-0.2degrees total rear?) as wider tires generate more lateral force per slip angle, and you shouldn't need as much camber as narrower tires (might try ~1.5 - 2 degrees all around? WAG...) Then again, way-too-wide tires spooned on to narrow (for 315 tires anyway!) wheels might suggest a bit more camber than that. I dunno...

Tires are definitely WIDE for 9" wheels! Nitto gives 10.5" - 12.5" as the rim width range for your tire size. Your wheels are 1.5" narrower than the minimum!
Thanks for the help some one answered my question finally.

I know 9" is a bit small but i havent had any problems.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2012 | 12:11 PM
  #26  
clarkster009's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 4
Default

Why get such a low offset if you want to run 315s? With that wide body you could get wider wheels in a higher offset.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2012 | 12:57 PM
  #27  
RedCelica's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,342
Likes: 103
From: Raleigh
Default

Originally Posted by arazs2k
Originally Posted by ZDan' timestamp='1339236417' post='21767912
Optimal alignment depends on many factors, but generally you won't want much toe at all (zero front, maybe 0.1-0.2degrees total rear?) as wider tires generate more lateral force per slip angle, and you shouldn't need as much camber as narrower tires (might try ~1.5 - 2 degrees all around? WAG...) Then again, way-too-wide tires spooned on to narrow (for 315 tires anyway!) wheels might suggest a bit more camber than that. I dunno...

Tires are definitely WIDE for 9" wheels! Nitto gives 10.5" - 12.5" as the rim width range for your tire size. Your wheels are 1.5" narrower than the minimum!
Thanks for the help some one answered my question finally.

I know 9" is a bit small but i havent had any problems.
Here's a thought...buy bigger wheels!

No problems? Have you taken a corner yet?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2012 | 01:17 PM
  #28  
arazs2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Glendale
Default

Previous setup i was running 265 all around i never thought i can run 315s on the wheels i have right now but i guess i was wrong .I ordered a tire to see the fitment and as u can see the results .............. , low offset makes it more aggressive .
flush on 9" wheel with +17 offset works for me.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2012 | 01:30 PM
  #29  
arazs2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Glendale
Default

Originally Posted by RedCelica
Originally Posted by arazs2k' timestamp='1339263630' post='21768483
[quote name='ZDan' timestamp='1339236417' post='21767912']
Optimal alignment depends on many factors, but generally you won't want much toe at all (zero front, maybe 0.1-0.2degrees total rear?) as wider tires generate more lateral force per slip angle, and you shouldn't need as much camber as narrower tires (might try ~1.5 - 2 degrees all around? WAG...) Then again, way-too-wide tires spooned on to narrow (for 315 tires anyway!) wheels might suggest a bit more camber than that. I dunno...

Tires are definitely WIDE for 9" wheels! Nitto gives 10.5" - 12.5" as the rim width range for your tire size. Your wheels are 1.5" narrower than the minimum!
Thanks for the help some one answered my question finally.

I know 9" is a bit small but i havent had any problems.
Here's a thought...buy bigger wheels!

No problems? Have you taken a corner yet?
[/quote]

Yes day n night difference from running the 265s
Now i take big U turns in second gear full throttle with 4.77 gears not even a squeak.
Im going to track soon will see how it performes.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2012 | 08:00 PM
  #30  
RedCelica's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,342
Likes: 103
From: Raleigh
Default

what tires did you have before?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 AM.