Opinion on Kuhmo Ecsta MX ?
Originally Posted by spa-zz,Jan 31 2006, 08:35 AM
What did the Car and Driver test say about the MX again? I can't recall.
Originally Posted by spa-zz,Feb 1 2006, 08:46 PM
How is it that everyone likes them but car and driver said they suck?
Dry: Yoko, BFG, MI, Good, Bridge, Hank, Pir, Kum, Dun, Cont, Toy.
Wet: Good, Cont, Bridge, MI, Yoko, Dun, Pir, Toy, Hank, BFG, Kum.
Overall: Good, Yoko, Hank, Cont, MI, Bridge, Pir, Dun, BFG, Kum, Toy.
I don't remember exactly what C&D said about the Kumhos, but I'm pretty sure they got lambasted for their wet performance.
had em on my prelude and will probably get them again when the time comes for the S. for the price, i don't think you can get better performance. the only gripe i had about it compared to my old yokohamas is that the yokos would whine once i started to reach the limit, while the mx's were absolutely quiet.
Originally Posted by falcorider,Feb 2 2006, 12:30 PM
I don't remember exactly what C&D said about the Kumhos, but I'm pretty sure they got lambasted for their wet performance.
Jim,
I have my02, to go with the Kumho MX, I would have to go with 245/45/16 (as opposed to the oem 225/50/16), correct? What alternate size would you recommend since they don't come in this size?
For everyone, how would these compare to the oem s-02? Also, is it a problem to have different tires rear to front. My front s-02 are still good and only need to change the rears. Will it be a problem at all?
thanks all.
I have my02, to go with the Kumho MX, I would have to go with 245/45/16 (as opposed to the oem 225/50/16), correct? What alternate size would you recommend since they don't come in this size?
For everyone, how would these compare to the oem s-02? Also, is it a problem to have different tires rear to front. My front s-02 are still good and only need to change the rears. Will it be a problem at all?
thanks all.







