Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Subtleties of tire width...

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 04:01 PM
  #1  
Saki GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default Subtleties of tire width...

Hi, I've been poking around the stickies and reading up on tires, and maybe I missed it, but is there any discussion on the differences experienced when using slightly wider tires on our cars? The reason I ask is that I see many people opting for (on MY04+) 225 over 215 and 255 over 245 on stock rims with no rubbing issues, but what is the reasoning behind this?

I can think of looks and a wider contact patch as benefits, and rolling resistance and friction as drawbacks, but is there a good reason to go with wider tires, or will I notice any difference? Is there really any point in going up one size?

Thanks, and if there's a thread on this, I'd love a link!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 04:25 PM
  #2  
CoastS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: New London, CT
Default

Street only? Autocross? Track? The effect wider rear tires have on your car will depend on what kind of driving your're doing.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 05:39 PM
  #3  
Saki GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Okay, so I am looking at tire width during normal and spirited driving on roads, not autocrossing or tracking the car. I think I understand that wider rear or front tires will effect the car's turning response, but is there any benefit to going wider on all four corners at the same time?

Thanks,
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 04:38 AM
  #4  
CoastS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: New London, CT
Default

If you go wider front and rear, and maintain the same front/rear stagger (the difference in section width between the front and rear tires) you'll end up with more total grip, in theory.

The tradeoffs are going to be increased unsprung weight, road noise, maybe even a decrease in fuel economy. Not to mention bigger tires will be more expensive. Not sure on the exact sizes you're looking at, but you might introduce speedometer error and change the gearing of the car if your wider tires are also taller or shorter than OEM.

IMHO, if all you're going to do is drive the car on the street, your AP2 doesn't really need any more rubber. Just stick with the OEM bridgestones, they're very good.

If you're interested in getting better turn-in/reducing the AP2's tendency to understeer, I recommend an alignment change rather than tire change.
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 05:52 AM
  #5  
Saki GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

I'm looking at the Kumho Ecsta MX's, but I can't find their tread width listed, so my best guess is that the fronts on 215s are 8.46" and on 225 they are 8.56".

Looking at my stock Re050s, the tread width is listed as 6.7" - much narrower than the recommended Kumho tire, so to offset this, I'm thinking of fatter rear rubber - Since the Kumhos in theory don't grip as well as the Bridgestones, would getting fatter tires (at least on the rear) help maintin grip levels?

Also, I do plan to get the car realigned when I get new tires, but I'm happy with the turn-in now, and like to keep it as close as I can with the new tires.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drexelmech
Wheels and Tires
16
Aug 5, 2009 06:56 AM
crazee928
Wheels and Tires
4
Jan 16, 2008 02:15 PM
skullbang
Wheels and Tires
0
Oct 15, 2007 11:16 PM
S2005x
Wheels and Tires
3
Jun 26, 2007 08:25 PM
Doug0716
Wheels and Tires
2
Jul 27, 2005 02:45 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:08 AM.