Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tire matching question for Jim

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 10:12 AM
  #1  
Leo Gets's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
From: Driver's seat
Default

Jim,
you've been a great help before and I had another question for you.

I am getting 18x8 for the fronts and 18x9 for the rears.
My first thought was to use 225/40 18 for the fronts and 255/35 18 for the rears.
However I really want to try out the BFGoodrich g-Force KD and they do not offer the 255.
They do however offer a 265/35 18... so my questions is:

Do you recommend I still use the 225's up front or should I match them with a 235?
Here are some numbers I came across, but am still not sure what would be a better match.

Specification
a. 235/40-18
b. 265/35-18

Sidewall
a. 3.7in
b. 3.7in

Radius
a. 12.7in
b. 12.7in

Diameter
a. 25.4in
b. 25.3in

Circumference
a. 79.8in
b. 79.5in

Revs/Mile
a. 794
b. 797

Difference
a. 0.0%
b. -0.4%

~~~~~~~~~~
Specification
a. 225/40-18
b. 265/35-18

Sidewall
a. 3.5in
b. 3.7in

Radius
a. 12.5in
b. 12.7in

Diameter
a. 25.1in
b. 25.3in

Circumference
a. 78.8in
b. 79.5in

Revs/Mile
a. 804
b. 797

Difference
a. 0.0%
b. 0.9%




Thnx again Jim
~Leo
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 08:23 AM
  #2  
Jim@tirerack's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,319
Likes: 7
From: South Bend
Default

I think it would depend on the wheel width and offset as to whether it will fit. I would say that the front will be very tight.
I am not sure it would fit.

Jim
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 04:05 PM
  #3  
Leo Gets's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
From: Driver's seat
Default

if what woud fit... the 225 or the 235?
front offset is 58 rear is 68...

anywhoo, placeing fitment issues aside, which tire would be a better match for the 265s (the 225s or the 235s)?

thx
~Leo
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 07:31 PM
  #4  
Leo Gets's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
From: Driver's seat
Default

anyone..anyone???
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 11:19 PM
  #5  
WRS2K's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,425
Likes: 0
From: Kirkland
Default

leo,

i think this is a question better addressed by those in the racing and competition forum. particularly by jzr. perhaps u should PM him?

i believe you'd be closer to the stock stagger ratio by going 225/265 rather than 235/265 for whatever that's worth. but then more rubber to the ground.... definitely one for the track masters.

good luck,
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #6  
Leo Gets's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
From: Driver's seat
Default

thanx man
I shoot him a pm
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2003 | 09:08 AM
  #7  
jvils's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: West Palm Beach
Default

I read in the racing forum that the stock stager is about 1.5", so converting the mm to in for front and back:

225/265 is about 1.57"
235/265 is about 1.18"

So with 235/265, you'll be getting more traction up front than the stock set up, which can be offset with a bigger sway bar. 225/265 looks like a better match, or at least it's closer to the stock stagger.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
octechgeek
Wheels and Tires
4
Sep 7, 2008 12:16 AM
2HOTS2k
Wheels and Tires
10
Mar 29, 2006 05:43 PM
b8b88
Wheels and Tires
4
Apr 24, 2003 09:20 AM
MeCCaJM
Wheels and Tires
2
Apr 24, 2003 08:54 AM
Moneeb
Wheels and Tires
12
Oct 27, 2001 04:05 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:54 PM.