93 nsx vs. 02 s2k
01-30-2007, 09:13 AM
#31
No sweat! Also, you didn't mention it, but I thought I'd check and make sure you get a speedometer calibrater. 4.77's will put you off by about 14% IIRC...
-Aaron
-Aaron
01-31-2007, 02:15 PM
#33
Registered User
Originally Posted by Spartikus,Jan 31 2007, 03:08 PM
Aren't the early NA1's also geared a bit too tall? I don't understand why everyone called b.s. This race is perfectly believable.
02-02-2007, 11:11 AM
#34
Originally Posted by versionJDM,Jan 31 2007, 03:15 PM
yes they are, but that makes them even more wicked when their boosted. i ran with a 91 NSX with a CTSC setup and it just plain ****ing flew, pardon my french. with my foot through the floor banging the gears, i couldnt keep up at all, were talking 10+ cars and im not slow by anymeans.
A lot of non-sense floating around this thread
02-02-2007, 08:03 PM
#36
Registered User
sounds like a good race. NSX's are pretty slow and i'd imagine the S could throw down a good challenge.
My friend has a 3.2-M6 and I used to think it was pretty slow until he got a blower. Now its a pretty fun car
My friend has a 3.2-M6 and I used to think it was pretty slow until he got a blower. Now its a pretty fun car
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post