AP2 vs LS1 fbody
02-02-2007, 04:59 PM
#51
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurboDSMJ,Feb 2 2007, 05:05 PM
My Dad's oil-burning bone stock auto '99 LS1 Z28 with bald tires went 13.80's @ 103. So I guess it's possible.
02-02-2007, 05:32 PM
#52
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurboDSMJ,Feb 2 2007, 05:05 PM
My Dad's oil-burning bone stock auto '99 LS1 Z28 with bald tires went 13.80's @ 103. So I guess it's possible.
02-02-2007, 11:01 PM
#53
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spartikus,Feb 2 2007, 06:32 PM
Exactly. Not everything is perfect. I'm NOT saying that an S2k is faster than an LS1, but it's not entirely improbable that an S2k could beat one. To assume that all LS1 cars with any driver will be a low 13 second car is to ignore a lot of other factors.
The oil-burning. I bet the guy is using the "wrong" oil in the car.
02-03-2007, 08:50 AM
#54
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kirtland AFB
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-03-2007, 03:43 PM
#55
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cyntex,Feb 3 2007, 09:50 AM
Something just isnt fair, lol. What do you think an F-body with exhaust+lid vs. a stock S2K with a broken tranny mount would have looked like?
EDIT:
The guy runs mid 9's in that car in the 1/8 mile at 80mph. This is VERY! sub-standard for an LS1 F-body.
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...eoID=1229009546
^there he is doing so. (A few of his other passes looked better, 82mph, but he was still in the 9's. I am betting it is an auto with 2.73 gears or something.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post