Auto Racing Discussion F1, IRL, Champ Car, Nascar, WRC, BTCC, etc. Discuss recent races, results.

2013 engine

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 01:26 PM
  #31  
SkRlet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GinoGT,Dec 12 2010, 08:00 PM
You're right, maybe they should shorten the races too, God knows that an extra lap around Spa might very well push us over the edge and exhaust the global fuel supply
^^^hahaha
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2010 | 12:18 AM
  #32  
samerthehammer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

I don't know if you guys will like it, but it gave some interesting about 2013 eng regs. What do you guys think of what is said in the vid?[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5LW8RJ0R1s [/media]
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2010 | 01:52 AM
  #33  
S2k007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,081
Likes: 2
From: Temecula, CA
Default

^ Hey thats really cool. I didn't expect them to open up the engine regs more (with the exception of some key fixed points) and encourage innovation.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2010 | 04:00 AM
  #34  
boltonblue's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 37,392
Likes: 6,303
From: bolton
Default

Originally Posted by timrocks311,Dec 13 2010, 03:54 PM


F1 is a show! I say guzzle all the gas you possibly can. As long as it is interesting, I don't care. I want to see giant V12 engines getting 1.2 mpg reving at 22k rpm make 900 hp. They could run on new born babies, i don't care.

These pussy 4 cylinder, 12k rpm engines are lame.
Respectfully, please allow me to disagree.
I have recollection of when F1 was running turbo fours back in the late 70's.
I have fond memories of being trackside at the Canadian GP and having to stuff tissues in our ears from the sounds. These were spectacular cars.

I'll propose it may bring out the better drivers. Narrower power bands will require better and more precise shifting.
As for power, give it time, the engineers will find it.


Mind you, they are doing an awful lot of things which will restrict flexibility to find power.

fuel = power, plain and simple. That is why they are limiting the fuel rail to control max power.



Reply
Old Dec 22, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #35  
WarrenW's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,766
Likes: 8
From: Queens, NY
Default

A 4 cyl w/ 750 HP? Awesome! Would love to see that.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2010 | 03:09 PM
  #36  
Whitefire818's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 12,783
Likes: 0
From: SFV, Los Angeles, CA
Default

I don't mind having a 4 cylinder F1 car but don't limit the revs so low. Maybe they will just throw on massive turbos and make up for it but I'd rather see high revving cars.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 12:45 AM
  #37  
brent_strong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: Franklin TN
Default

Originally Posted by WarrenW,Dec 22 2010, 04:46 PM
A 4 cyl w/ 750 HP? Awesome! Would love to see that.
Look at practically any type of import and you'll see plenty. There are a boatload of Evo owners making that kind of power.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2010 | 06:56 PM
  #38  
samerthehammer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

It is disappointing news, but we will have to wait and see for the 2013 season. I do hope that KERS is better utilized instead of 6.6 sec push to pass method
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2010 | 06:13 PM
  #39  
S2k007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,081
Likes: 2
From: Temecula, CA
Default

^ KERS is suppose to be the double the strength allowed previously.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2010 | 05:39 PM
  #40  
Ultra_Nexus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,330
Likes: 0
From: Frustration
Default

It is a good job you guys don't make the rules

These regs will envigorate the sport no end.

You need to realise how high profile F1 is and that they need to offer up innovation to be shown to improve efficiency.

I mean if you could have your road car be the same fun performance machine, yet it was 35% more efficient, you wouldn't say no would you - more time playing, less time stuck at a petrol station. Not to mention when a 'gallon o' gas' costs over $10 (as it does in UK), it makes a lot of sense to filter this down to road cars.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:46 AM.