FiA and the diffuser hearing
I pull for Brawn cause they're the Underdogs and everyone loves a fairy tale story. But I hope the diffusers are deemed ILEGAL. So i can call Brawn: Brachers or w/e other dumb name for chaeaters.
Just to piss off the drama llama.
Just to piss off the drama llama.
Originally Posted by Birel186,Apr 14 2009, 07:36 PM
I pull for Brawn cause they're the Underdogs and everyone loves a fairy tale story. But I hope the diffusers are deemed ILEGAL. So i can call Brawn: Brachers or w/e other dumb name for chaeaters.
Just to piss off the drama llama.
Just to piss off the drama llama.
Yay!! now I hope this means that Brawn, Button & Barichello secure the championship for 2009. 
Come to think of it, there was no hard evidence presented by the non-diffuser gang which was very evident in Nigel Tozzi calling RB arrogant. No way would that argument stand in front of any rational judge.

Come to think of it, there was no hard evidence presented by the non-diffuser gang which was very evident in Nigel Tozzi calling RB arrogant. No way would that argument stand in front of any rational judge.
Originally Posted by Triple-H,Apr 15 2009, 06:42 AM
Finally, a decision is made.
Can't wait for all the other teams to make up their own version!
Can't wait for all the other teams to make up their own version!

The only odd part to this story is that when other teams asked about this type of diffuser, the FIA told them it was illegal.
So that tells me:
1 - the diffuser was different enough to be called illegal
or
2 - they didn't ask the right question
I think Ferrari is going to have their work cut out for them this year....
[QUOTE]










